Gregor Zattler g...@gmx.de writes:
like so:
$ cd ~/src/emacs/; rm -rf * ; git co -f emacs-24
Checking out files: 100% (3525/3525), done.
Previous HEAD position was 0f0917d... Regenerate AUTHORS and ldefs-boot.el
Switched to branch 'emacs-24'
(Here I am assuming emacs-24 is still checked
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org writes:
From: lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de
Cc: monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, b...@altern.org, 17...@debbugs.gnu.org,
g...@gmx.de, theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:10:19 +0200
It's git, right? The one that has git checkout BRANCH and stuff?
From: Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr
Cc: monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, 17...@debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:20:24 +0200
I suspect your local emacs-24 branch isn't the actual emacs-24
branch.
Seconded.
cd .git ; cat config
$ cat config
[core]
Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr [19. Jun. 2014]:
Gregor Zattler g...@gmx.de writes:
like so:
$ cd ~/src/emacs/; rm -rf * ; git co -f emacs-24
Checking out files: 100% (3525/3525), done.
Previous HEAD position was 0f0917d... Regenerate AUTHORS and ldefs-boot.el
Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net writes:
s$ git branch -a --contains HEAD
* emacs-24
master
remotes/origin/HEAD - origin/master
remotes/origin/master
remotes/origin/trunk
So indeed your local emacs-24 branch points in fact to a commit from
trunk.
I think running those commands should fix
Gregor Zattler writes:
Hi Eli,
* Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org [18. Jun. 2014]:
* Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca [07. Jun. 2014]:
BTW, I would also point out that people who do not actively develop
Emacs should ideally use the emacs-24 (i.e. 24.3.9x) branch now rather
than the
Ask savannah-hack...@gnu.org.
Then it's not worth the trouble (since it's a temporary change that
will need to be modified yet again when we release 24.4).
Stefan
From: Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca
Cc: l...@yun.yagibdah.de, b...@altern.org, 17...@debbugs.gnu.org,
g...@gmx.de, theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:04:39 -0400
Ask savannah-hack...@gnu.org.
Then it's not worth the trouble (since it's a temporary
Not sure what you have in mind, but perhaps we should rename the
branch to something like 'release-branch', and then its name won't
need to change with the Emacs versions.
It's not just the name: after the release we won't ask people to track
the release-branch. Maybe we could use a branch
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:52:05 +0200
From: Gregor Zattler g...@gmx.de
Cc: 17...@debbugs.gnu.org
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca [07. Jun. 2014]:
BTW, I would also point out that people who do not actively develop
Emacs should ideally use the emacs-24 (i.e. 24.3.9x)
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org writes:
From: lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:15:33 +0200
Cc: Bastien b...@altern.org, 17...@debbugs.gnu.org, g...@gmx.de,
Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr
Having cloned as described on
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca [07. Jun. 2014]:
BTW, I would also point out that people who do not actively develop
Emacs should ideally use the emacs-24 (i.e. 24.3.9x) branch now rather
than the trunk (24.4.50), so as to help us fix problems before the
24.4 release.
I'd
Hi Eli,
* Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org [18. Jun. 2014]:
* Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca [07. Jun. 2014]:
BTW, I would also point out that people who do not actively develop
Emacs should ideally use the emacs-24 (i.e. 24.3.9x) branch now rather
than the trunk (24.4.50), so as to
From: lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de
Cc: monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, b...@altern.org, 17...@debbugs.gnu.org,
g...@gmx.de, theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:10:19 +0200
It's git, right? The one that has git checkout BRANCH and stuff?
Yes, I pulled from the git repo
if (buf != current_buffer)
// error (`recenter'ing a window that does not display
current-buffer.);
return Qnil;
... in src/window.c seems to work for me.
Using `emacs-24' also works, without defeating the purpose of the
error message ;-)
Stefan
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr writes:
I don't know if the bug should
be closed in this siutation, so I'll leave it to someone else.
It should not be closed in Emacs bugs system yet, because the master
branch of Org is not released and not
From: lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:15:33 +0200
Cc: Bastien b...@altern.org, 17...@debbugs.gnu.org, g...@gmx.de,
Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr
Having cloned as described on http://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=emacs
with 'git clone
Perhaps add some advise to the web page so ppl pull the emacs24 branch
instead?
Does someone know how to change the text in
http://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=emacs?
Stefan
Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
if (buf != current_buffer)
// error (`recenter'ing a window that does not display
current-buffer.);
return Qnil;
... in src/window.c seems to work for me.
Using `emacs-24' also works, without defeating the purpose of the
From: Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:45:05 -0400
Cc: Bastien b...@altern.org, 17...@debbugs.gnu.org, g...@gmx.de,
Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr
Perhaps add some advise to the web page so ppl pull the emacs24 branch
instead?
Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org writes:
From: Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:53:47 +0200
Cc: 17...@debbugs.gnu.org, Gregor Zattler g...@gmx.de
FWIW, there was a call to recenter which was removed recently (less than
four weeks ago -- see
Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr writes:
I don't know if the bug should
be closed in this siutation, so I'll leave it to someone else.
It should not be closed in Emacs bugs system yet, because the master
branch of Org is not released and not merged into Emacs. I'll keep
this
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
Glenn Morris r...@gnu.org writes:
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Bastien, could you please look into this?
This is like forwarding every Emacs bug to Stefan.
I suggest instead reassigning the bug to org-mode (or emacs,org-mode),
then simply posting a reply in the
From: Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:53:47 +0200
Cc: 17...@debbugs.gnu.org, Gregor Zattler g...@gmx.de
FWIW, there was a call to recenter which was removed recently (less than
four weeks ago -- see
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Bastien, could you please look into this?
This is like forwarding every Emacs bug to Stefan.
I suggest instead reassigning the bug to org-mode (or emacs,org-mode),
then simply posting a reply in the normal way. It will then go to the
emacs-orgmode mailing list (which is
Glenn Morris r...@gnu.org writes:
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Bastien, could you please look into this?
This is like forwarding every Emacs bug to Stefan.
I suggest instead reassigning the bug to org-mode (or emacs,org-mode),
then simply posting a reply in the normal way. It will then go to the
26 matches
Mail list logo
