Please do not CC me on Emacs bug threads. If there's an issue in Flycheck
please take it to our issue tracker at
https://github.com/flycheck/flycheck/issues where we can keep track of it.
> From: Alex Bennée
> Cc: monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, rpl...@gmail.com,
> jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com, m...@lunaryorn.com
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:45:44 +0100
>
> ;; Save and restore the match data, as recommended in (elisp)Change Hooks
> (save-match-dat
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> From: Alex Bennée
>> Cc: Stefan Monnier , 23...@debbugs.gnu.org,
>> rpl...@gmail.com, jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:05:37 +0100
>>
>> > Do we care that using save-match-data in every call to replace-match
>> > might mean a perfo
> From: Alex Bennée
> Cc: Stefan Monnier , 23...@debbugs.gnu.org,
> rpl...@gmail.com, jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:05:37 +0100
>
> > Do we care that using save-match-data in every call to replace-match
> > might mean a performance hit? If it will, then t
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> From: Stefan Monnier
>> Cc: rpl...@gmail.com, 23...@debbugs.gnu.org, alex.ben...@linaro.org,
>> jwieg...@gmail.com, nljlistb...@gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:03:51 -0400
>>
>> I guess the next best thing is:
>> - copy search_regs.start and search_regs.end
