[Orgmode] Re: Help with a custom block agenda

2010-01-13 Thread Matt Lundin 
Hi Paul,

Paul Mead paul.d.m...@gmail.com writes:

 I want the option to have TODO items with the tag FOCUS listed in both
 the custom block agenda, and as a list in its own right. In the custom
 block agenda however, I only want to see those which are unscheduled,
 not WAITING, not STARTED as I've already listed those items above - it's
 this section where I want to see all the FOCUS actions which I haven't
 addressed yet.

Does the following work?

--8---cut here---start-8---
(setq org-agenda-custom-commands
   '((a Custom block Agenda
  ((agenda )
   (todo STARTED)
   (tags FOCUS/!-STARTED-WAITING  
 ((org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled t) 
 (d todo DONE
  ((org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled nil)
   (org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date nil)
   (org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines nil)))
 (p Project list tags project)
 (f FOCUS list tags-todo FOCUS)
))
--8---cut here---end---8---

Best,
Matt


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

[Orgmode] Re: Help with a custom block agenda

2010-01-13 Thread Paul Mead 
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
 block agenda however, I only want to see those which are unscheduled,
 not WAITING, not STARTED as I've already listed those items above - it's
 this section where I want to see all the FOCUS actions which I haven't
 addressed yet.

 Does the following work?

 (setq org-agenda-custom-commands
'((a Custom block Agenda
   ((agenda )
(todo STARTED)
(tags FOCUS/!-STARTED-WAITING  
((org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled t) 
  (d todo DONE
   ((org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled nil)
(org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date nil)
(org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines nil)))
  (p Project list tags project)
  (f FOCUS list tags-todo FOCUS)
 ))

THanks Matt, that very nearly works, it certainly gets rid of the
WAITING and STARTED, but I can still see the scheduled items - the
org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled bit doesn't seem to have any effect.

It's odd, given that the same syntax later in the list seems to have the
desired effect.

Any thoughts?

Thanks
Paul


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode