[Orgmode] Re: Simple wiki system like VIMWiki

2011-01-07 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
Forgot to add the link to VIMWiki:

http://code.google.com/p/vimwiki/

Regards,

Marcelo.

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
celose...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi list,

 I've started using vim lately for my programming needs and I love it,
 mostly because the motion and shortcuts are much more efficient. That
 aside, I still think emacs is a great platform and text-editor and I
 still use it for other stuff, mainly organizing myself (thanks to
 orgmode).

 Most of the todo/GTD stuff is well handled by org, but I do find that
 for reference and brainstorming, a real-time (and straightforward)
 wiki is the best solution. I have been managing to keep things simple
 by keeping all my reference org files under a (/wiki) folder and
 setting peepopen (an OSX cocoa fuzzy-finder
 (http://peepcode.com/products/peepopen)) to index specifically this
 folder and bound this to Command-w, and it works great for getting a
 quick index of the wiki and quickly open a file from it.

 However, linking and creating new files is far from optimal. Org-mode
 still tries to keep things at the headline-level, instead of at file
 level. This works, but for me,  not so well. Why? The simple fact that
 org asks me if I want to create a target in the current file or in a
 another file already gets me out of the zone. I prefer some convetion
 over configuration.

 It'd be nice if org had, for example, a more org-like wiki (like
 wikinodes) and a more traditional one (like VIMwiki). Not sure if
 there's another mode I could combo with org that would give the
 functionality I want, I'm open to suggestions :)

 Marcelo.


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Simple wiki system like VIMWiki

2011-01-07 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
Is no one interested in such feature?

Marcelo.

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
celose...@gmail.com wrote:
 Forgot to add the link to VIMWiki:

 http://code.google.com/p/vimwiki/

 Regards,

 Marcelo.

 On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
 celose...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi list,

 I've started using vim lately for my programming needs and I love it,
 mostly because the motion and shortcuts are much more efficient. That
 aside, I still think emacs is a great platform and text-editor and I
 still use it for other stuff, mainly organizing myself (thanks to
 orgmode).

 Most of the todo/GTD stuff is well handled by org, but I do find that
 for reference and brainstorming, a real-time (and straightforward)
 wiki is the best solution. I have been managing to keep things simple
 by keeping all my reference org files under a (/wiki) folder and
 setting peepopen (an OSX cocoa fuzzy-finder
 (http://peepcode.com/products/peepopen)) to index specifically this
 folder and bound this to Command-w, and it works great for getting a
 quick index of the wiki and quickly open a file from it.

 However, linking and creating new files is far from optimal. Org-mode
 still tries to keep things at the headline-level, instead of at file
 level. This works, but for me,  not so well. Why? The simple fact that
 org asks me if I want to create a target in the current file or in a
 another file already gets me out of the zone. I prefer some convetion
 over configuration.

 It'd be nice if org had, for example, a more org-like wiki (like
 wikinodes) and a more traditional one (like VIMwiki). Not sure if
 there's another mode I could combo with org that would give the
 functionality I want, I'm open to suggestions :)

 Marcelo.



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Simple wiki system like VIMWiki

2011-01-07 Thread Nick Dokos
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa celose...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is no one interested in such feature?
 

Just an fyi:

I don't know whether it's generally the case, but I received your
original mail (with date Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:07:57 -0600) at the same
time as I received your follow-up (with date Fri, 7 Jan 2011 09:03:46
-0600), so either the original mail was hung up at your end or it was
hung up on the list server or some other unfortunate event happened. In
any case, even if I were interested, I would have had no time to
consider it.

Regards,
Nick

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Simple wiki system like VIMWiki

2011-01-07 Thread Nick Dokos
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:

 Marcelo de Moraes Serpa celose...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Is no one interested in such feature?
  
 
 Just an fyi:
 
 I don't know whether it's generally the case, but I received your
 original mail (with date Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:07:57 -0600) at the same
 time as I received your follow-up (with date Fri, 7 Jan 2011 09:03:46
 -0600), so either the original mail was hung up at your end or it was
 hung up on the list server or some other unfortunate event happened. In
 any case, even if I were interested, I would have had no time to
 consider it.
 

Looking at it more closely, it seems to have kicked around the list server
for 24 hours:

,
| ...
| Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56564 helo=lists.gnu.org)
|   by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
|   id 1PbE8I-0002JO-KX
|   for nicholas.do...@hp.com; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:21:38 -0500
| Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54242 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
|   by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ParRh-0003Vq-78
|   for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:08:17 -0500
| ...
`

Nick

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Simple wiki system like VIMWiki

2011-01-07 Thread Matt Lundin
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa celose...@gmail.com writes:

 However, linking and creating new files is far from optimal. 

Could you please explain what you mean here?

I find C-u C-c C-l to be a very efficient way of creating file links
(both to new and existing files).

Also, the following two settings make it quite easy to open new links:

(setq org-return-follows-link t)
(setq org-open-non-existing-files t)

 Org-mode still tries to keep things at the headline-level, instead of
 at file level.

Again, could you please explain what you mean by this? 

The following instructions will make org behave less like an outline and
more like a tradition wiki (such as muse mode):

1. Create links with C-u C-c C-l (even better: rebind this to something
   simpler).
2. Use the settings above to open links easily.
3. [Optional] Set org-startup-folded to nil for a full-page view.
4. [Optional] Create a single wrapper function that creates a new link,
   opens the file, and adds the file to the list of agenda files.

And since org-mode supports inline images and all sorts of hyperlinks,
this will provide everything necessary for a nice wiki system.

Well, almost everything I suppose the last step would be to modify
org-wikinodes to allow CamelCase links to files.

Best,
Matt

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Simple wiki system like VIMWiki

2011-01-07 Thread Samuel Wales
I'd think org could do anything needed for this.  I know Marcelo asked
about separate files, but in principle, a command can allow ido to
help select olpaths, for ease of use.

In principle, it can even create a header and refile it using ido to a
suitable location, and put an org ID link to it at point.  Offhand I
don't know of an existing way of doing this.

To get even fancier, agenda can search for the current node's ID -- or
(for excellent fanciness) any other designator in any mode such as
capture recognizes -- so that you have the equivalent of a reverse
link without having to explicitly create a bidirectional link.  I
wrote something about this possibility and can dredge it up if there
is interest.

Samuel

-- 
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
I support WPI: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html -- PLEASE DONATE
===
I want to see the original (pre-hold) Lo et al. 2010 NIH/FDA/Harvard MLV paper.

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode