On 02 Dec 2019, Marco Wahl wrote:
>Karl Fogel writes:
>> Since `widen' itself is already available via C-x n w, it might be
>> better to save a special flag value like that for some special
>> behavior that we (or someone else) might think of in the future. I'm
>> pretty sure that anyone using
Karl Fogel writes:
> On 02 Dec 2019, Marco Wahl wrote:
>>What about numeric prefix arg 0 to reveal the whole buffer (aka
>>'widen')? I think this would be a logical completion to the feature.
>
> Since `widen' itself is already available via C-x n w, it might be
> better to save a special flag
On 02 Dec 2019, Marco Wahl wrote:
>What about numeric prefix arg 0 to reveal the whole buffer (aka
>'widen')? I think this would be a logical completion to the feature.
Since `widen' itself is already available via C-x n w, it might be better to
save a special flag value like that for some
Karl Fogel writes:
> It allows you to choose what level subtree to narrow to. There are
> two ways to specify the subtree: use repeated C-u's to select "upward"
> from the current subtree, or use a direct numeric prefix arg to
> specify the subtree "downward" from level 1. (This is a somewhat
Karl Fogel writes:
> This is the enhancement to `org-narrow-to-subtree' that I suggested back in
> May [1].
>
> It allows you to choose what level subtree to narrow to. There are two
> ways to specify the subtree: use repeated C-u's to select "upward"
> from the current subtree, or use a direct
On 01 Dec 2019, Marco Wahl wrote:
>I guess it's a good idea to write to Bastien explicitly.
I will do so.
>Thanks for asking about the version. AFAICT there is a feature freeze
>right now for version 9.3. This means you would commit to the 'next'
>branch which shall be the next master branch
Hi Karl,
>>I think your enhancement is great and worth a news entry. What about
>>pushing your code if nobody objects within one week?
>
> Thanks, Marco; I'm glad you like it. I'll wait a week and then push
> (unless there's discussion, in which case we'll see what the outcome
> of the
On 01 Dec 2019, Marco Wahl wrote:
>+1
>
>I think your enhancement is great and worth a news entry. What about
>pushing your code if nobody objects within one week?
Thanks, Marco; I'm glad you like it. I'll wait a week and then push (unless
there's discussion, in which case we'll see what the
Karl Fogel writes:
> This is the enhancement to `org-narrow-to-subtree' that I suggested back in
> May [1].
>
> It allows you to choose what level subtree to narrow to. There are
> two ways to specify the subtree: use repeated C-u's to select "upward"
> from the current subtree, or use a
This is the enhancement to `org-narrow-to-subtree' that I suggested back in May
[1].
It allows you to choose what level subtree to narrow to. There are two ways to
specify the subtree: use repeated C-u's to select "upward" from the current
subtree, or use a direct numeric prefix arg to
10 matches
Mail list logo
