Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs incompatibility)

2009-12-03 Thread Carsten Dominik

Hi Richard,

I ave fixed this in a different way.  Please verify!

- Carsten

On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:


Hello Carsten, this failed for me ever since, but as I haven't needed
the functionality I was just lazy to report it.  Oh:) I see why my  
patch

must be problematic, sorry about that.

The problem is that, when pressed a number as a reply to the question,
this cond command (see below) always goes to the error clause, because
rpl gets the value of ?1 for example, but sel-list look like  
((49 . ...)
(50 . ...)) so the assoc can't find ?1.  With my patch, the assoc  
finds

it because rpl is converted to ASCII code, but now ?q and ?x clauses
don't work.:)

 (cond
  ((eq rpl ?q) nil)
  ((eq rpl ?x) nil)
  ((assoc rpl sel-list) (cdr (assoc rpl sel-list)))
  (t (error Invalid task choice %c rpl)))

I hope you see what the problem is, I think it must be an XEmacs  
issue.


Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix  
(XEmacs incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:



Hi Richard, I don't see why this would be necessary?  Under what
circumstances does this fail?



- Carsten



On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:



See attached simple patch.



From 795d529d622f509f47c2bf17a0139fbe1659cc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001 From: Richard Klinda rkli...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009
21:03:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] org-clock: org-clock-select-task
bugfix (XEmacs)



--- lisp/org-clock.el | 4  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0
deletions(-)



diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el index
56dbab5..87017fc 100644
--- a/lisp/org-clock.el
+++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
@@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ of a different task.)
(org-fit-window-to-buffer) (message (or prompt Select task for
clocking:)) (setq rpl (read-char-exclusive))
+ (when (featurep 'xemacs)
+ ;; in XEmacs read-char-exclusive returns character, instead
of
+ ;; ascii value
+ (setq rpl (char-octet rpl)))
(cond ((eq rpl ?q) nil) ((eq rpl ?x) nil) -- 1.6.2.1




-- Richard ___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies
to the list.  Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode



- Carsten


--
Richard


- Carsten





___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs incompatibility)

2009-12-03 Thread Richard KLINDA
Almost good, but the variable s contains a list, we need to
int-to-char the car of that, see attached trivial patch.  It works
with this.  Thank you.

diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el
index 321dd95..ce309ef 100644
--- a/lisp/org-clock.el
+++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ of a different task.)
(if ( i 10)
(+ i ?0)
  (+ i (- ?A 10))) m))
-  (if (fboundp 'int-to-char) (setq s (int-to-char s)))
+  (if (fboundp 'int-to-char) (setf (car s) (int-to-char (car s
   (push s sel-list)))
org-clock-history)
   (org-fit-window-to-buffer)


 Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs 
 incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:

   Hi Richard, I ave fixed this in a different way.  Please verify!

   - Carsten

   On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:

   Hello Carsten, this failed for me ever since, but as I haven't
   needed the functionality I was just lazy to report it.  Oh:) I see
   why my patch must be problematic, sorry about that.

   The problem is that, when pressed a number as a reply to the
   question, this cond command (see below) always goes to the error
   clause, because rpl gets the value of ?1 for example, but sel-list
   look like ((49 . ...)  (50 . ...)) so the assoc can't find ?1.
   With my patch, the assoc finds it because rpl is converted to ASCII
   code, but now ?q and ?x clauses don't work.:)

   (cond ((eq rpl ?q) nil) ((eq rpl ?x) nil) ((assoc rpl sel-list)
   (cdr (assoc rpl sel-list))) (t (error Invalid task choice %c
   rpl)))

   I hope you see what the problem is, I think it must be an XEmacs
   issue.

   Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix
   (XEmacs incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:

   Hi Richard, I don't see why this would be necessary?  Under what
   circumstances does this fail?

   - Carsten

   On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:

   See attached simple patch.

   From 795d529d622f509f47c2bf17a0139fbe1659cc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
   2001 From: Richard Klinda rkli...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec
   2009 21:03:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] org-clock:
   org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs)

   --- lisp/org-clock.el | 4  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+),
   0
   deletions(-)

   diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el index
   56dbab5..87017fc 100644
   --- a/lisp/org-clock.el
   +++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
   @@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ of a different task.)
   (org-fit-window-to-buffer) (message (or prompt Select task for
   clocking:)) (setq rpl (read-char-exclusive))
   + (when (featurep 'xemacs)
   + ;; in XEmacs read-char-exclusive returns character, instead
   of
   + ;; ascii value
   + (setq rpl (char-octet rpl)))
   (cond ((eq rpl ?q) nil) ((eq rpl ?x) nil) -- 1.6.2.1


   -- Richard ___
   Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies
   to the list.  Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
   http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

   - Carsten

   -- Richard

   - Carsten

-- 
Udv, Richard
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs incompatibility)

2009-12-03 Thread Carsten Dominik

Ah, of course, sorry about that, thanks.

- Carsten

On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:


Almost good, but the variable s contains a list, we need to
int-to-char the car of that, see attached trivial patch.  It works
with this.  Thank you.

diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el
index 321dd95..ce309ef 100644
--- a/lisp/org-clock.el
+++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ of a different task.)
   (if ( i 10)
   (+ i ?0)
 (+ i (- ?A 10))) m))
-  (if (fboundp 'int-to-char) (setq s (int-to-char s)))
+  (if (fboundp 'int-to-char) (setf (car s) (int-to-char  
(car s

  (push s sel-list)))
   org-clock-history)
  (org-fit-window-to-buffer)


Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix  
(XEmacs incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:



Hi Richard, I ave fixed this in a different way.  Please verify!



- Carsten



On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:



Hello Carsten, this failed for me ever since, but as I haven't
needed the functionality I was just lazy to report it.  Oh:) I see
why my patch must be problematic, sorry about that.



The problem is that, when pressed a number as a reply to the
question, this cond command (see below) always goes to the error
clause, because rpl gets the value of ?1 for example, but sel-list
look like ((49 . ...)  (50 . ...)) so the assoc can't find ?1.
With my patch, the assoc finds it because rpl is converted to ASCII
code, but now ?q and ?x clauses don't work.:)



(cond ((eq rpl ?q) nil) ((eq rpl ?x) nil) ((assoc rpl sel-list)
(cdr (assoc rpl sel-list))) (t (error Invalid task choice %c
rpl)))



I hope you see what the problem is, I think it must be an XEmacs
issue.



Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix
(XEmacs incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:



Hi Richard, I don't see why this would be necessary?  Under what
circumstances does this fail?



- Carsten



On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:



See attached simple patch.



From 795d529d622f509f47c2bf17a0139fbe1659cc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001 From: Richard Klinda rkli...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec
2009 21:03:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] org-clock:
org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs)



--- lisp/org-clock.el | 4  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+),
   0
deletions(-)



diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el index
56dbab5..87017fc 100644
--- a/lisp/org-clock.el
+++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
@@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ of a different task.)
(org-fit-window-to-buffer) (message (or prompt Select task for
clocking:)) (setq rpl (read-char-exclusive))
+ (when (featurep 'xemacs)
+ ;; in XEmacs read-char-exclusive returns character, instead
of
+ ;; ascii value
+ (setq rpl (char-octet rpl)))
(cond ((eq rpl ?q) nil) ((eq rpl ?x) nil) -- 1.6.2.1




-- Richard ___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies
to the list.  Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode



- Carsten



-- Richard



- Carsten


--
Udv, Richard


- Carsten





___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs incompatibility)

2009-12-02 Thread Richard KLINDA
Hello Carsten, this failed for me ever since, but as I haven't needed
the functionality I was just lazy to report it.  Oh:) I see why my patch
must be problematic, sorry about that.

The problem is that, when pressed a number as a reply to the question,
this cond command (see below) always goes to the error clause, because
rpl gets the value of ?1 for example, but sel-list look like ((49 . ...) 
(50 . ...)) so the assoc can't find ?1.  With my patch, the assoc finds
it because rpl is converted to ASCII code, but now ?q and ?x clauses
don't work.:)

  (cond
   ((eq rpl ?q) nil)
   ((eq rpl ?x) nil)
   ((assoc rpl sel-list) (cdr (assoc rpl sel-list)))
   (t (error Invalid task choice %c rpl)))

I hope you see what the problem is, I think it must be an XEmacs issue.

 Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs 
 incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:

   Hi Richard, I don't see why this would be necessary?  Under what
   circumstances does this fail?

   - Carsten

   On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:

   See attached simple patch.

   From 795d529d622f509f47c2bf17a0139fbe1659cc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
   2001 From: Richard Klinda rkli...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009
   21:03:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] org-clock: org-clock-select-task
   bugfix (XEmacs)

   --- lisp/org-clock.el | 4  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0
   deletions(-)

   diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el index
   56dbab5..87017fc 100644
   --- a/lisp/org-clock.el
   +++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
   @@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ of a different task.)
   (org-fit-window-to-buffer) (message (or prompt Select task for
   clocking:)) (setq rpl (read-char-exclusive))
   + (when (featurep 'xemacs)
   + ;; in XEmacs read-char-exclusive returns character, instead
   of
   + ;; ascii value
   + (setq rpl (char-octet rpl)))
   (cond ((eq rpl ?q) nil) ((eq rpl ?x) nil) -- 1.6.2.1


   -- Richard ___
   Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies
   to the list.  Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
   http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

   - Carsten

-- 
Richard


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs incompatibility)

2009-12-01 Thread Richard KLINDA
See attached simple patch.

From 795d529d622f509f47c2bf17a0139fbe1659cc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Klinda rkli...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:03:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] org-clock: org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs)

---
 lisp/org-clock.el |4 
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el
index 56dbab5..87017fc 100644
--- a/lisp/org-clock.el
+++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
@@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ of a different task.)
   (org-fit-window-to-buffer)
   (message (or prompt Select task for clocking:))
   (setq rpl (read-char-exclusive))
+  (when (featurep 'xemacs)
+;; in XEmacs read-char-exclusive returns character, instead of
+;; ascii value
+(setq rpl (char-octet rpl)))
   (cond
((eq rpl ?q) nil)
((eq rpl ?x) nil)
-- 
1.6.2.1


-- 
Richard
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs incompatibility)

2009-12-01 Thread Carsten Dominik

Hi Richard,

I don't see why this would be necessary?  Under what circumstances  
does this fail?


- Carsten

On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:


See attached simple patch.

From 795d529d622f509f47c2bf17a0139fbe1659cc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Klinda rkli...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:03:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] org-clock: org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs)

---
lisp/org-clock.el |4 
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el
index 56dbab5..87017fc 100644
--- a/lisp/org-clock.el
+++ b/lisp/org-clock.el
@@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ of a different task.)
  (org-fit-window-to-buffer)
  (message (or prompt Select task for clocking:))
  (setq rpl (read-char-exclusive))
+  (when (featurep 'xemacs)
+;; in XEmacs read-char-exclusive returns character, instead  
of

+;; ascii value
+(setq rpl (char-octet rpl)))
  (cond
   ((eq rpl ?q) nil)
   ((eq rpl ?x) nil)
--
1.6.2.1


--
Richard
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


- Carsten





___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode