Re: [O] [bug] Error evaluating table expression with relative references
On Tuesday, 9 Jun 2015 at 15:04, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Hello, Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes: I seem to have encountered a bug in table spreadsheet evaluations. See this example: #+begin_src org ,* Table evaluation with relative references | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | #ERROR | ,#+TBLFM: @1$4=vsum($1..$3)::@2$4=vsum($1..$-1) #+end_src As far as I can tell, the two formulae should be equivalent? Or am I missing something silly (not unlikely ;-)? Turning on debugging shows that the first formula gets converted to vsum([1,2,3]) whereas the second goes to vsum((1)..(3)). Fixed in 3924989b4f45a5c7ff89a4f7abdebc570cbaf7e2. Thank you. Confirmed! Many thanks. -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.4.1, Org release_8.3beta-802-g7e4228.dirty
Re: [O] [bug] Error evaluating table expression with relative references
Hello, Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes: I seem to have encountered a bug in table spreadsheet evaluations. See this example: #+begin_src org ,* Table evaluation with relative references | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | #ERROR | ,#+TBLFM: @1$4=vsum($1..$3)::@2$4=vsum($1..$-1) #+end_src As far as I can tell, the two formulae should be equivalent? Or am I missing something silly (not unlikely ;-)? Turning on debugging shows that the first formula gets converted to vsum([1,2,3]) whereas the second goes to vsum((1)..(3)). Fixed in 3924989b4f45a5c7ff89a4f7abdebc570cbaf7e2. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
