Hello,
Greg Minshall writes:
> below is a format-patch. i signed FSF papers for emacs a number of
> years ago (and for gawk more recently).
Perfect. I applied it. Thank you!
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Nicolas,
below is a format-patch. i signed FSF papers for emacs a number of
years ago (and for gawk more recently).
cheers, Greg
From e2d440186ccf62216406abb440455edbac72ba79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Greg Minshall
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:45:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] some clarification
Greg Minshall writes:
> two minor edits i might make to the first paragraph, 1) to make clear
> that #+name: names only one block, and 2) to (maybe?) simplify the
> latter part of the same paragraph, while, at the same time, trying to
> keep a strong mention of the distinction between =NAME= and
hi, Nicolas,
thanks, and sorry, i should have git-pull'd. the new version seems very
nice to me. two minor edits i might make to the first paragraph, 1) to
make clear that #+name: names only one block, and 2) to (maybe?)
simplify the latter part of the same paragraph, while, at the same time,
Hello,
Greg Minshall writes:
> Nicolas,
>
> thank you. wordsmithing opens up endless possibilities, so i don't know
> that the following is at all an improvement on your suggestion. but, it
> occurs to me to get the importance of =noweb-ref=, and its role in
> concatenation, brought out early
Nicolas,
thank you. wordsmithing opens up endless possibilities, so i don't know
that the following is at all an improvement on your suggestion. but, it
occurs to me to get the importance of =noweb-ref=, and its role in
concatenation, brought out early on the "page".
one paragraph currently
Hello,
Greg Minshall writes:
> thanks for the history! sounds like a good tradeoff. i agree, a bit
> more documentation would be good.
I sligthly reworded Noweb references section in the manual. Please let
me know if that is clearer.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Nicolas,
thanks for the history! sounds like a good tradeoff. i agree, a bit
more documentation would be good.
cheers, Greg
Greg Minshall writes:
> Nicolas, thanks. i take it this is a change from (recent?) past
> behavior?
I think this was done between Org 9.1 and 9.2, the final step probably
being 99dbca3d4f2fb30f35309a0bf4c324535b7dc9f3
> it was kind of nice the old way, but i suspect i'll get used
> to the
Nicolas, thanks. i take it this is a change from (recent?) past
behavior? it was kind of nice the old way, but i suspect i'll get used
to the new way (no names, just noweb-ref) fairly soon. cheers, Greg
Hello,
Greg Minshall writes:
> hi. the description of :noweb-ref says
>
> When expanding “noweb” style references, the bodies of all code block
> with _either_ a block name matching the reference name _or_ a
> ‘:noweb-ref’ header argument matching the reference name will be
> concatenated
hi. the description of :noweb-ref says
When expanding “noweb” style references, the bodies of all code block
with _either_ a block name matching the reference name _or_ a
‘:noweb-ref’ header argument matching the reference name will be
concatenated together to form the replacement text.
12 matches
Mail list logo
