Hi Greg and Nicolas,
Greg Minshall writes:
> Nicolas and Juan Manuel,
>
> thanks very much. the bugfix branch seems to work for my case.
Thank you very much Nicolas. In my case it also works fine.
Best regards,
Juan Manuel
Nicolas and Juan Manuel,
thanks very much. the bugfix branch seems to work for my case.
cheers, Greg
Hello,
Juan Manuel Macías writes:
> Greg Minshall writes:
> In any case, I don't know if that behavior should be considered a bug. I
> say this because other constructions with an unbalanced element,
> although org does not fontify them well, they are exported correctly:
>
> this is a
Greg Minshall writes:
> Juan Manuel,
>
>> I can confirm that behavior. One possible solution is to use an entity
>> (M-x org-entities-help):
>
> thanks very much -- that does the trick for my case.
In any case, I don't know if that behavior should be considered a bug. I
say this because other
Juan Manuel,
> I can confirm that behavior. One possible solution is to use an entity
> (M-x org-entities-help):
thanks very much -- that does the trick for my case.
cheers, Greg
Hi Greg,
Greg Minshall writes:
> hi. experimenting [after significant confusion!], it appears that
> including a single (unpaired) double quote inside an anonymous footnote
> eliminates the recognition of the footnote. is this intentional?
>
> this works:
>
> this is a test.[fn:: a very
hi. experimenting [after significant confusion!], it appears that
including a single (unpaired) double quote inside an anonymous footnote
eliminates the recognition of the footnote. is this intentional?
this works:
this is a test.[fn:: a very long footnote]
whereas this doesn't:
