Thanks Eric.
I wasn't looking for anything in particular. Seeing the E-M-S 3-line
notation reminded me what a pain those invisible delimiters for
raising/lowering indexing scripts can be. Which was what made me reach
out to bzg.
(I won't be able to reply from this address as it expires in
On Tuesday, 18 Feb 2020 at 00:43, VanL wrote:
> Question for the list. Can the HAL/S notation be used for editing a
> symbol, in expanded form, with prefix/postfix sub/superscript? The
> collapsed form is a single line pretty printing tiny sub/superscript
> before and after the symbol.
Maybe
Bastien writes:
> VanL writes:
>
>> I was picturing a way to edit the
>> super/subscripts in expanded immediate mode using the EMS notation and
>> then collapsing that to single line pretty printing. Hope that makes sense.
>
> well, it kinda makes more sense now that I can better visualize it
