Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> The org-beamer--normalize-argument function ensures that the action is
>> enclosed in [<...>] and [...] for options.
>
> Or <...>. In particular,
> (org-beamer--normalize-argument raw-actions 'action)
> , will return (possibly stripping duplicate <>)
> Looking at 12.7 S
"Fraga, Eric" writes:
> On Thursday, 13 Oct 2022 at 10:39, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> Take your time. What I do not want here is introducing new bugs. I am
>> not familiar with ox-beamer and do not want to miss anything subtle.
>
> Thank you. I'll update you in due course.
Have you had a chance t
On Thursday, 13 Oct 2022 at 10:39, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Take your time. What I do not want here is introducing new bugs. I am
> not familiar with ox-beamer and do not want to miss anything subtle.
Thank you. I'll update you in due course.
> Or <...>. In particular,
> (org-beamer--normalize-ar
"Fraga, Eric" writes:
> On Wednesday, 12 Oct 2022 at 14:00, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> Your patch adds for columns
>
> All I did was copy the code that was there for options and adapted for
> actions. I really do not understand what the rest of the code does and
> really do not have the time (due
Hi Ihor,
On Wednesday, 12 Oct 2022 at 14:00, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Your patch adds for columns
All I did was copy the code that was there for options and adapted for
actions. I really do not understand what the rest of the code does and
really do not have the time (due to teaching obligations)
"Fraga, Eric" writes:
> On Saturday, 8 Oct 2022 at 14:10, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> This patch certainly adds code duplication and might also miss some
>> scenarios considered in the environments from
>> org-beamer-environments-default.
>
> I'm not sure what code duplication you are referring to
On Saturday, 8 Oct 2022 at 14:10, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> This patch certainly adds code duplication and might also miss some
> scenarios considered in the environments from
> org-beamer-environments-default.
I'm not sure what code duplication you are referring to unless it's the
two lines that n
"Fraga, Eric" writes:
> On Thursday, 6 Oct 2022 at 08:01, Fraga, Eric wrote:
>> On Thursday, 6 Oct 2022 at 11:06, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>>> Is there any reason why you only allow actions for "column" environment
>>> specifically? What about other environments?
>
> I've removed the check (not on
On Thursday, 6 Oct 2022 at 08:01, Fraga, Eric wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 Oct 2022 at 11:06, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> Is there any reason why you only allow actions for "column" environment
>> specifically? What about other environments?
I've removed the check (not only for the new actions aspect bu
On Thursday, 6 Oct 2022 at 11:06, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Is there any reason why you only allow actions for "column" environment
> specifically? What about other environments?
Good question. But I don't know the answer! I was mimicking the existing code
(e.g. the line above). I am not sure o
"Fraga, Eric" writes:
> On Wednesday, 5 Oct 2022 at 06:38, reza wrote:
>> But the overlay specification is missing on the second column and I
>> guess this is a bug?
>
> Maybe a bug or more simply a missing feature. On line 552 of
> ox-beamer.el, we add options but there is no equivalent for ad
On Wednesday, 5 Oct 2022 at 06:38, reza wrote:
> But the overlay specification is missing on the second column and I
> guess this is a bug?
Maybe a bug or more simply a missing feature. On line 552 of
ox-beamer.el, we add options but there is no equivalent for adding
actions to the column defini
Hi List
I have the following MWE:
* A section
** A Frame
*** A left column
:PROPERTIES:
:BEAMER_COL: 0.48
:END:
*** A right column
:PROPERTIES:
:BEAMER_COL: 0.48
:BEAMER_ACT: <2->
:END:
And I would expect the following tex output:
\s
13 matches
Mail list logo
