Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Hi Robert, Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info writes: A very late follow-up: I note that the Worg instructions for HTML export still cite org-insert-export-options-template: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-publish-html-tutorial.html Can you fix this? Please send me your public key if you don't have access to Worg already, I'll give you push access. Thanks in advance! -- Bastien
Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
A very late follow-up: I note that the Worg instructions for HTML export still cite org-insert-export-options-template: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-publish-html-tutorial.html
Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Hello Bastien, Bastien wrote: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: It has been removed. Such a template depends on the back-end used, which was not the case of the previous implementation. One idea would be to have an equivalent of the now-defunct `org-insert-export-options-template' but for each backend. For example `C-c C-e h t' would insert the default template for the HTML export. Is anyone interested in this? My personal answer is: yes! I constantly used it for inserting a title (defaulting to the name of the file, which is the best default), timestamp, etc. Regarding Rasmus objections, yes, maybe there are too much defaults inserted, or not yours. Maybe the template could be customized, but present in the code base with a common, good default? If not, anyway, I'll just mimick the old template with a YASnippet. Best regards, Seb PS- By the way, there is already such a sort of template for Beamer... -- Sebastien Vauban
Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Hello, Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org writes: Hello Bastien, Bastien wrote: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaziou-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org writes: It has been removed. Such a template depends on the back-end used, which was not the case of the previous implementation. One idea would be to have an equivalent of the now-defunct `org-insert-export-options-template' but for each backend. For example `C-c C-e h t' would insert the default template for the HTML export. Is anyone interested in this? My personal answer is: yes! I constantly used it for inserting a title (defaulting to the name of the file, which is the best default), timestamp, etc. You can also type #+ti M-TAB M-TAB to get the same result. It works for most default keywords. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Hey Seb, On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:15:05PM +0100, Sebastien Vauban wrote: PS- By the way, there is already such a sort of template for Beamer... I believe Nicolas' argument was, for the new exporter such a template depends on the backend hence a default one for beamer makes sense but not a backend agnostic template. I'm not completely sure I follow the argument though, since keywords like TITLE, DATE, AUTHOR, or even an OPTIONS line seem generic enough for most backends. But then I have not thought long enough to spot any inconsistencies. :-p Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: It has been removed. Such a template depends on the back-end used, which was not the case of the previous implementation. One idea would be to have an equivalent of the now-defunct `org-insert-export-options-template' but for each backend. For example `C-c C-e h t' would insert the default template for the HTML export. Is anyone interested in this? -- Bastien
Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Bastien b...@altern.org writes: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: It has been removed. Such a template depends on the back-end used, which was not the case of the previous implementation. One idea would be to have an equivalent of the now-defunct `org-insert-export-options-template' but for each backend. For example `C-c C-e h t' would insert the default template for the HTML export. Is anyone interested in this? Well I found this template very helpful! I hope there will be an equivalent to it. I think (for the beginning) it could be a compilation of *all* back-end variations (commented out? I don't yet understand the new exporter concept). Thanks -- Best wishes H. Dieter Wilhelm Darmstadt Germany
Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Bastien b...@altern.org writes: It has been removed. Such a template depends on the back-end used, which was not the case of the previous implementation. One idea would be to have an equivalent of the now-defunct `org-insert-export-options-template' but for each backend. For example `C-c C-e h t' would insert the default template for the HTML export. Is anyone interested in this? Not really. IMO, the old template added to much noise and didn't have nice defaults. That's purely subjective, though! IMO, it would be better to have a section on adopting mechanisms such as org-structure-template-alist for templates. Personally, I use org-latex-classes for rudimentary customizations (letter, problemset, thesis etc.). –Rasmus -- Send from my Emacs
Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes: Not really. IMO, the old template added to much noise and didn't have nice defaults. That's purely subjective, though! That's what this thread is for -- collect purely subjective feedback so we can get a rough idea of whether it's useful to implement this feature or not :) -- Bastien
[O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Hi- Been using the new exporter for a while, and have not had much problem w/ the migration, but it seems that org-insert-export-options-template and the associated keybinding in the dispatch menu are gone. Once the old exporter (org-exp.el) is entirely gone, it's going to be real difficult (at least for me :) not start a new org file. Am i missing a replacement function in the new exporter, or has this functionality been removed entirely? rick
Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Been using the new exporter for a while, and have not had much problem w/ the migration, but it seems that org-insert-export-options-template and the associated keybinding in the dispatch menu are gone. Once the old exporter (org-exp.el) is entirely gone, it's going to be real difficult (at least for me :) not start a new org file. Am i missing a replacement function in the new exporter, or has this functionality been removed entirely? I guess one option might be org-structure-template-alist. You could make different templates and could even customize them based on the particularities needed. Probably, however, there is a better approach that I'm unaware of. –Rasmus -- A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it
Re: [O] {New exporter] What happened to the export template
Hello, Rick Frankel r...@rickster.com writes: Been using the new exporter for a while, and have not had much problem w/ the migration, but it seems that org-insert-export-options-template and the associated keybinding in the dispatch menu are gone. Once the old exporter (org-exp.el) is entirely gone, it's going to be real difficult (at least for me :) not start a new org file. Am i missing a replacement function in the new exporter, or has this functionality been removed entirely? It has been removed. Such a template depends on the back-end used, which was not the case of the previous implementation. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
