Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Carsten Dominik writes: > On 15.10.2011, at 16:14, Eric S Fraga wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik writes: >> >>> On 14.10.2011, at 13:31, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> I have nothing against (1) as item bullets, as it doesn't interfere with any existing Org syntax. >>> >>> T

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

On 15.10.2011, at 16:14, Eric S Fraga wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On 14.10.2011, at 13:31, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > [...] > >> >>> I have nothing against (1) as item bullets, as it doesn't interfere >>> with any existing Org syntax. >> >> That is not the only criterion. Adding

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Eric S Fraga writes: > I am in the "keep it simple school". So long as org allows me to > distinguish between numbered and unnumbered itemised lists, I am > happy. I actually would prefer less choices than there are currently > because I would like to get to my choice more quickly when I do use

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

I'm 100% with Eric, just that I would say "-" and "(1)" are enough. On 2011-10-15, at 16:14 , Eric S Fraga wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On 14.10.2011, at 13:31, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > [...] > >> >>> I have nothing against (1) as item bullets, as it doesn't interfere >>> with any

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Carsten Dominik writes: > On 14.10.2011, at 13:31, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: [...] > >> I have nothing against (1) as item bullets, as it doesn't interfere >> with any existing Org syntax. > > That is not the only criterion. Adding new syntax elements make more > ASCII sequences special. The

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Hi all, I am quite impressed by this discussion, thanks a lot. I am an org-mode user for just a couple of days, and an emacs user for four weeks today. Needless to say, I can't contribute anything useful to this discussion. The only thing(s) I would like to say is/are: (1) If it is not too comp

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Hi everyone, On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Jambunathan K wrote: > Is it psychologically very taxing to see 1. instead of a (1) in an Org > buffer. Could it be so taxing that a user's productivity will be > impacted by it? > For my personal use I don't care much as long as there are ordered/en

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

On 14.10.2011, at 13:31, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Marius Hofert wrote: >> >> >>> What do you mean by "better solution"? As far as I can tell, your >>> approach is precisely what Suvayu pointed to. >> >> No: what Suvayu pointed to can be done with the stan

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

> What about letting go those two variables and create > `org-list-bullet-types', which would be a list of strings like: > >'("-" "+" "*" "1." "1)" "(1)" "a." "a)" "A)" "A.") > > It would be hard-coded but every bullet type could be opt-in or > opt-out via customize. The defaul

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Hello, Nick Dokos writes: > Marius Hofert wrote: > > >> What do you mean by "better solution"? As far as I can tell, your >> approach is precisely what Suvayu pointed to. > > No: what Suvayu pointed to can be done with the standard latex exporter, > so it would not require changes to org-list-g

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Alan E. Davis wrote: > Without diving into how to set it up in org-mode, the paralist package for > LaTeX enables inline numbered lists, as in > > %% In preamble > \usepackage{paralist} > > %% In document > \begin{inparaenum} >    \item first element >   \item second element > \end{inparaenum}

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Marius Hofert wrote: > What do you mean by "better solution"? As far as I can tell, your > approach is precisely what Suvayu pointed to. No: what Suvayu pointed to can be done with the standard latex exporter, so it would not require changes to org-list-generic-to-latex. Just add something like

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Without diving into how to set it up in org-mode, the paralist package for LaTeX enables inline numbered lists, as in %% In preamble \usepackage{paralist} %% In document \begin{inparaenum} \item first element \item second element \end{inparaenum} As to how to organize this to be an option

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Dear Nick, thanks for helping. What do you mean by "better solution"? As far as I can tell, your approach is precisely what Suvayu pointed to. Using your approach, of course much more is possible, please look at the create "enumitem" package with all its customizations. But this approach is

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

[ I started this earlier but I guess I didn't send it out. Suvayu has replied in the meantime with a pointer to a better solution than this one, but this might be of some minor interest to some people as well - besides, I spent a whole 20 minutes on it, half of it trying to figure out why

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Hi Marius, On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Marius Hofert wrote: > Dear Suvayu, > > thanks. > It would be good to know how latex export can be customized to achieve this. > This thread might be helpful: -- Suvayu Open source is t

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Dear Suvayu, thanks. It would be good to know how latex export can be customized to achieve this. Cheers, Marius On 2011-10-13, at 11:37 , suvayu ali wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Marius Hofert > wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> In the manual, I found that numbered lists can be create

Re: [O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Marius Hofert wrote: > Dear all, > > In the manual, I found that numbered lists can be created with 1), 2), ... or > 1., 2., ... > How can I get numbered lists like this: (1), (2),...? > I found org-list-demote-modify-bullet, but the help (and a google search) di

[O] How to get numbered lists (1), (2), … ?

Dear all, In the manual, I found that numbered lists can be created with 1), 2), ... or 1., 2., ... How can I get numbered lists like this: (1), (2),...? I found org-list-demote-modify-bullet, but the help (and a google search) did not help me in finding a solution to this. Cheers, Marius