Re: [O] #+CALL get the first row of output table lost when using latex export
#+NAME: t2 #+CALL: t1() :exports results :hlines yes will give the right latex output, thank you! Kind regards, Tian Qiu On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Charles C. Berry wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, iem...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Thank you, Charles. And =:colnames yes= does work here. But the >> results are the same when I evaluate t1 and t2 with >> `org-babel-execute-maybe'. >> >> When I take another try, new problem seems to occur. >> >> The test file is: >> #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE >> #+NAME: t1 >> #+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results >> return [['A'],None,[2],None,[3]] >> #+END_SRC >> >> #+CAPTION: T1 >> #+RESULTS: t1 >> >> #+NAME: t2 >> #+CALL: t1() :exports results >> >> #+CAPTION: T2 >> #+RESULTS: t2 >> #+END_EXAMPLE >> >> The results of `org-babel-execute-maybe' on t1 and t2 are identical: >> #+BEGIN_SRC org >> | A | >> |---| >> | 2 | >> |---| >> | 3 | >> #+END_SRC > > > Not in my world (unless you add `:hlines'). > > , > | #+NAME: t1 > | #+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results > | return [['A'],None,[2],None,[3]] > | #+END_SRC > | > | #+CAPTION: T1 > | #+RESULTS: t1 > | | A | > | |---| > | | 2 | > | |---| > | | 3 | > | > | #+NAME: t2 > | #+CALL: t1() :exports results > | > | #+CAPTION: T2 > | #+RESULTS: t2 > | | A | > | | 2 | > | | 3 | > ` > > > ob-python.el seems to be doing its own thing here. > > What you see in the second instance is the usual Babel output for a table. > > In my view this is a bug in ob-python.el. > > See: (info "(org) hlines") for the proper idiom. > > HTH, > > Chuck
Re: [O] #+CALL get the first row of output table lost when using latex export
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, iem...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you, Charles. And =:colnames yes= does work here. But the results are the same when I evaluate t1 and t2 with `org-babel-execute-maybe'. When I take another try, new problem seems to occur. The test file is: #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE #+NAME: t1 #+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results return [['A'],None,[2],None,[3]] #+END_SRC #+CAPTION: T1 #+RESULTS: t1 #+NAME: t2 #+CALL: t1() :exports results #+CAPTION: T2 #+RESULTS: t2 #+END_EXAMPLE The results of `org-babel-execute-maybe' on t1 and t2 are identical: #+BEGIN_SRC org | A | |---| | 2 | |---| | 3 | #+END_SRC Not in my world (unless you add `:hlines'). , | #+NAME: t1 | #+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results | return [['A'],None,[2],None,[3]] | #+END_SRC | | #+CAPTION: T1 | #+RESULTS: t1 | | A | | |---| | | 2 | | |---| | | 3 | | | #+NAME: t2 | #+CALL: t1() :exports results | | #+CAPTION: T2 | #+RESULTS: t2 | | A | | | 2 | | | 3 | ` ob-python.el seems to be doing its own thing here. What you see in the second instance is the usual Babel output for a table. In my view this is a bug in ob-python.el. See: (info "(org) hlines") for the proper idiom. HTH, Chuck
Re: [O] #+CALL get the first row of output table lost when using latex export
Thank you, Charles. And =:colnames yes= does work here. But the
results are the same when I evaluate t1 and t2 with
`org-babel-execute-maybe'.
When I take another try, new problem seems to occur.
The test file is:
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
#+NAME: t1
#+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results
return [['A'],None,[2],None,[3]]
#+END_SRC
#+CAPTION: T1
#+RESULTS: t1
#+NAME: t2
#+CALL: t1() :exports results
#+CAPTION: T2
#+RESULTS: t2
#+END_EXAMPLE
The results of `org-babel-execute-maybe' on t1 and t2 are identical:
#+BEGIN_SRC org
| A |
|---|
| 2 |
|---|
| 3 |
#+END_SRC
The relevant part of the latex output is:
#+BEGIN_SRC latex
\begin{table}[htb]
\caption{T1}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{r}
A\\
\hline
2\\
\hline
3\\
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[htb]
\caption{T2}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{r}
A\\
2\\
3\\
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
#+END_SRC
Both \hlines in Table T2 are missing.
Kind regards,
Tian Qiu
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Charles Berry wrote:
> gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I encounter a problem when I use #+CALL to create a table with latex
>> export. The problem is that the first row of the table is missing, if
>> the table is created with #+CALL.
>>
> [deleted - setup info]
>
>> The minimal table example is
>>
>> #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
>> #+NAME: t1
>> #+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results
>> return [['A'],None,[2]]
>> #+END_SRC
>>
>> #+CAPTION: T1
>> #+RESULTS: t1
>>
>> #+NAME: t2
>> #+CALL: t1() :exports results
>>
>> #+CAPTION: T2
>> #+RESULTS: t2
>> #+END_EXAMPLE
>>
>
> This is not a latex issue per se. If you evaluate t2 with
>
> `org-babel-execute-maybe'
>
> the same thing will happen.
>
> org-babel-execute:python does its own formatting. #+CALL: OTOH passes
> the results to babel.
>
> The workaround is to use
>
> #+CALL: t1() :colnames yes
>
> HTH,
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
Re: [O] #+CALL get the first row of output table lost when using latex export
gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > I encounter a problem when I use #+CALL to create a table with latex > export. The problem is that the first row of the table is missing, if > the table is created with #+CALL. > [deleted - setup info] > The minimal table example is > > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE > #+NAME: t1 > #+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results > return [['A'],None,[2]] > #+END_SRC > > #+CAPTION: T1 > #+RESULTS: t1 > > #+NAME: t2 > #+CALL: t1() :exports results > > #+CAPTION: T2 > #+RESULTS: t2 > #+END_EXAMPLE > This is not a latex issue per se. If you evaluate t2 with `org-babel-execute-maybe' the same thing will happen. org-babel-execute:python does its own formatting. #+CALL: OTOH passes the results to babel. The workaround is to use #+CALL: t1() :colnames yes HTH, Chuck
[O] #+CALL get the first row of output table lost when using latex export
Hi,
I encounter a problem when I use #+CALL to create a table with latex
export. The problem is that the first row of the table is missing, if
the table is created with #+CALL.
My Emacs version is GNU Emacs 24.4.3 (x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0,
Carbon Version 157 AppKit 1265.21) of 2014-11-04 on Atago.local. The
Org-mode version is: 8.2.10 from orgmode.org homepage.
I start emacs -q -l emacs.minimal, where emacs.minimal is
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
(add-to-list 'load-path (expand-file-name "~/myconfig/org-8.2.10/lisp"))
(add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '("\\.\\(org\\ |org_archive\\|txt\\)$"
. org-mode))
(add-to-list 'load-path (expand-file-name "~/myconfig/org-8.2.10/contrib/lisp"))
(org-babel-do-load-languages
'org-babel-load-languages
'((python . t)
(latex . t)))
#+END_EXAMPLE
The minimal table example is
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
#+NAME: t1
#+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results
return [['A'],None,[2]]
#+END_SRC
#+CAPTION: T1
#+RESULTS: t1
#+NAME: t2
#+CALL: t1() :exports results
#+CAPTION: T2
#+RESULTS: t2
#+END_EXAMPLE
The latex output of Table T1 is:
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
\begin{table}[htb]
\caption{T1}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{r}
A\\
\hline
2\\
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
#+END_EXAMPLE
The latex output of Table T2 is:
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
\begin{table}[htb]
\caption{T2}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{r}
2\\
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
#+END_EXAMPLE
Compare with the latex output of the two tables, the first row and the
\hline in the first table is missing in the second one.
Kind regards,
Tian Qiu
