Daniel Bausch danielbau...@gmx.de writes:
Anyone? It might be a duplicate of what Gustav Wiktröm reported on 1st of
September, but his problem was not resolved, either.
Daniel
Am Dienstag 15. November 2011, 22:12:45 schrieb Daniel Bausch:
Hello list,
consider the following example:
|
Martyn Jago martyn.j...@btinternet.com writes:
Apologies I had a typo - please ignore the previous mail. So this looks more
sensible:
Daniel Bausch danielbau...@gmx.de writes:
Anyone? It might be a duplicate of what Gustav Wiktröm reported on 1st of
September, but his problem was not
Martyn Jago martyn.j...@btinternet.com wrote:
Martyn Jago martyn.j...@btinternet.com writes:
Apologies I had a typo - please ignore the previous mail. So this looks more
sensible:
Daniel Bausch danielbau...@gmx.de writes:
Anyone? It might be a duplicate of what Gustav Wiktrom
What may be a leading hint is that even
| -28799 | -08:00:01 |
#+TBLFM: $2=$1;T
does not deliver correct results. It should deliver -07:59:59.
Daniel
Am Mittwoch 23. November 2011, 11:23:49 schrieb Nick Dokos:
Martyn Jago martyn.j...@btinternet.com wrote:
Martyn Jago
Anyone? It might be a duplicate of what Gustav Wiktröm reported on 1st of
September, but his problem was not resolved, either.
Daniel
Am Dienstag 15. November 2011, 22:12:45 schrieb Daniel Bausch:
Hello list,
consider the following example:
|A | B | C |
|
Hello list,
consider the following example:
|A | B | C |
|--+---+---|
| 07:11:00 | -08:00:00 | -01:11:00 |
#+TBLFM: $3=$1+$2;T
I think the result in the third column is wrong. I expect 0 hours and 49
minutes, negative (-00:49:00).
The following
