Re: [O] [Babel][Bug] results silent ignored in #+call

2011-03-15 Thread Andreas Leha
Hi Eric, thanks for your answer. Just for me to understand: What is your suggestion then, if I still want the source code block to be evaluated during export? I asked a while ago on this list how to do that and got the answer :exports results :results silent which to my understanding now makes

Re: [O] [Babel][Bug] results silent ignored in #+call

2011-03-15 Thread Eric Schulte
Hi Andreas, If the call line has a :session header argument, then it should be evaluated on export; regardless of the value of the :export header argument. Adding a :exports none header argument, should inhibit the insertion of any results into the exported document. In your example below, the

Re: [O] [Babel][Bug] results silent ignored in #+call

2011-03-15 Thread Andreas Leha
Hi Eric, thanks a lot! Seems to be fixed for me. Cheers, Andreas Am 15.03.2011 14:13, schrieb Eric Schulte: Hi Andreas, If the call line has a :session header argument, then it should be evaluated on export; regardless of the value of the :export header argument. Adding a :exports none

[O] [Babel][Bug] results silent ignored in #+call

2011-03-14 Thread Andreas Leha
Hi everyone, Just pulled the latest HEAD and found that there is a regression in babel. When a source block is evaluated via #+call the :results silent header arguement is ignored during export =test file * Test1 #+srcname: test #+begin_src R :session

Re: [O] [Babel][Bug] results silent ignored in #+call

2011-03-14 Thread Eric Schulte
Hi Andreas, The :exports results header argument is overriding the :results silent header argument, which IMO is desired behavior. Thanks to your example I see this is not the case for regular code blocks. I would think that the behavior should be changed for regular code blocks, s.t. both of