Hi Bastien,
I'm here, but frankly the list is a bit hard to follow regularly :)
As for the patch, definitely! It's a lot more clean way, and fixes value
results. Thanks Asrail!
--a.
2012/10/24 Bastien b...@altern.org
Hi Andrzej,
Asrail posted this patch against ob-scala.el a while ago.
Hi Andrzej,
Andrzej Lichnerowicz unje...@gmail.com writes:
I'm here, but frankly the list is a bit hard to follow regularly :)
You bet...
As for the patch, definitely! It's a lot more clean way, and fixes
value results. Thanks Asrail!
Thanks to both of you, I've now applied the patch!
Hi Andrzej,
Asrail posted this patch against ob-scala.el a while ago.
Can you confirm it is okay to apply it? I'm reattaching
the patch in case you are not reading the Orgmode mailing
list anymore.
Thanks in advance!
Asrail asr...@gmail.com writes:
* lisp/ob-scala.el
Hi,
Could someone please review this patch?
On Oct 15, 2012 4:39 PM, Asrail asr...@gmail.com wrote:
* lisp/ob-scala.el (org-babel-scala-wrapper-method): Use an scala
block enclosing the submitted code
The string representing an well formed block was not an Scala
code. I put the string
Asrail asr...@gmail.com writes:
* lisp/ob-scala.el (org-babel-scala-wrapper-method): Use an scala
block enclosing the submitted code
The string representing an well formed block was not an Scala
code. I put the string from the user into an block, surrounded by an
call to replace the
* lisp/ob-scala.el (org-babel-scala-wrapper-method): Use an scala
block enclosing the submitted code
The string representing an well formed block was not an Scala
code. I put the string from the user into an block, surrounded by an
call to replace the default output stream.