Hi all,
org-footnote-renumber-fn:N invalidates footnotes that appear as the
first thing on a line. Here's a test file including the recipe.
--8---cut here---start-8---
* Bla
This is a line in which the following footnote that is inserted exactly
[fn:1]
Hello,
Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org writes:
org-footnote-renumber-fn:N invalidates footnotes that appear as the
first thing on a line. Here's a test file including the recipe.
* Bla
This is a line in which the following footnote that is inserted exactly
[fn:1] is the first
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
It looks like the original function isn't right in more than one way
(it doesn't even make sure the matched string is really a
footnote). But that's another topic.
Yes, indeed.
About your patch, I have but one question: I don't get a situation in
Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org writes:
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
About your patch, I have but one question: I don't get a situation in
which the assert would be triggered, may you give me such an example?
I don't either, and that's a good thing. I added that just as
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
I don't either, and that's a good thing. I added that just as some
extra paranoia so that you get an error if a footnote gets broken.
Well, provided the first part of the function doesn't modify the
buffer, I still don't see how the assert
Patch applied. Thank you.
Now, onto the other problems in that function...
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
