Re: [O] [PATCH] org-babel-goto-named-src-block bugfix and test

Hello, Marco Wahl writes: > I have no idea for a cleaner implementation of these tests. AFAICS > these tests look good (and also your code.) If someone has a better > idea for the tests they can be changed. I don't. > I would drop test > > #v+ > ;; non-existent name

Re: [O] [PATCH] org-babel-goto-named-src-block bugfix and test

>>> The test uses lines like: >>> >>> (execute-kbd-macro "\M-xorg-babel-goto-named-src-block\n\n") >>> >>> to emulate interactive usage. >>> >>> This feels like a hack, and the messages generated spill into my >>> *shell* buffer when I run `make test'. If there is a cleaner way to >>> do

Re: [O] [PATCH] org-babel-goto-named-src-block bugfix and test

On Sun, 12 Jun 2016, Marco Wahl wrote: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.emacs.orgmode as well. Hi Charles, [...] The test uses lines like: (execute-kbd-macro "\M-xorg-babel-goto-named-src-block\n\n") to emulate interactive usage.

Re: [O] [PATCH] org-babel-goto-named-src-block bugfix and test

Hi Charles, > [...] > The test uses lines like: > > (execute-kbd-macro "\M-xorg-babel-goto-named-src-block\n\n") > > to emulate interactive usage. > > This feels like a hack, and the messages generated spill into my > *shell* buffer when I run `make test'. If there is a cleaner way to >

[O] [PATCH] org-babel-goto-named-src-block bugfix and test

Hi all, The revision a few months back of `org-babel-goto-named-src-block' broke some of the interactive uses. I have fixed these in the attached patch. Also, I provide an ERT test for those interactive uses --- filling in the initial-input with the name of the symbol, results block name,