Aaron Ecay writes:
> Checking the source, date-to-time can raise an error (invalid date).
> format-time-string is a C function, so it’s less easy for me to
> understand. But it looks like if it raises any errors, these are bugs
> that we want to know about and not suppress.
Hi Jan,
2015ko azaroak 4an, Jan Malakhovski-ek idatzi zuen:
[...]
>> Also, what is ignore-errors protecting? The call to date-to-time, or
>> format-time-string? I think the scope of ignore-errors should be as
>> narrow as it can be.
>
> I have no idea. I moved these lines from org-gnus,
Aaron Ecay writes:
> Can you introduce a let binding so that (date-to-time x) is only called
> once?
Ok.
> Also, what is ignore-errors protecting? The call to date-to-time, or
> format-time-string? I think the scope of ignore-errors should be as
> narrow as it can be.
I
Hi Jan,
2015ko azaroak 3an, Jan Malakhovski-ek idatzi zuen:
[...]
> diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el
> index c466870..cf0ef1f 100755
> --- a/lisp/org.el
> +++ b/lisp/org.el
> @@ -9960,7 +9960,7 @@ active region."
>(car org-stored-links))
>
> (defun org-store-link-props (
* lisp/org.el (org-store-link-props): Rewrite function to get date-timestamp*
calculations.
* lisp/org-gnus.el:
* lisp/org-mhe.el:
* lisp/org-rmail.el:
* contrib/lisp/org-mew.el:
* contrib/lisp/org-vm.el:
* contrib/lisp/org-wl.el: Remove date-timestamp* copy-paste.
* doc/org.texi: Fix