Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Christian Moe <...> writes:
>
>> But is this only about special entities, or about all Org syntax,
>
> the latter.
Thanks for clarifying.
>> including subscripts/superscripts, emphasis...? That would be
>> limiting. As long as radio targets are visible parts of the text
Hello,
Christian Moe writes:
> But is this only about special entities, or about all Org syntax,
the latter.
> including subscripts/superscripts, emphasis...? That would be
> limiting. As long as radio targets are visible parts of the text, I'd
> like them to continue supporting such markup.
Excluding special entities would not interfere with anything I've done
with radio targets so far. I can imagine future uses, but probably
nothing I couldn't work around with Unicode.
But is this only about special entities, or about all Org syntax,
including subscripts/superscripts, emphasis...?
imo radio targets are fundamentally limited because they only work in
the same file, while org has become a multi-file mode. i am ok with
cosmetic limitations in addition.
--
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. And
Hi all,
the subject says it all -- see this thread for reference:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/83648
Would you be okay if radio targets like <<>>
are limited to plain text?
Thanks for your feedback,
--
Bastien
