y...@ydl.cm (Yuri D. Lensky) writes:
> From: "Yuri D. Lensky"
> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 13:37:46 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix timestamp-based sorting of tags-based entries in
> agenda
Applied. Thank you.
Regards,
Done.
>From 64c0ea3d6ac89d8ab12b030b9270ea21599a5c83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Yuri D. Lensky"
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 13:37:46 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix timestamp-based sorting of tags-based entries in agenda
* lisp/org.el (org-scan-tags): Fix agenda org tags scans to properly
add times
y...@mit.edu (Yuri D. Lensky) writes:
> Done.
Thank you.
However, you didn't tell me your status wrt FSF assignment (or forgot
the TINYCHANGE part in your commit message).
> +(defun org-agenda-entry-get-agenda-timestamp (pom)
> + "Given a point or maker POM, returns a cons cell of the
> +times
Done.
>From 131435ac43d950bad2bb42b92982f498de74a31f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Yuri D. Lensky"
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 13:37:46 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix timestamp-based sorting of tags-based entries in agenda
* lisp/org.el (org-scan-tags): Fix agenda org tags scans to properly
add timest
Hello,
Yuri D Lensky writes:
> An example to test this problem:
>
> Evaluate:
> (setq org-agenda-custom-commands
> '(("t" "TEST" tags-todo "tag"
> ((org-agenda-sorting-strategy '(deadline-up))
> then run the view. It will not be sorted properly before the patch,
> but will be
An example to test this problem:
Evaluate:
(setq org-agenda-custom-commands
'(("t" "TEST" tags-todo "tag"
((org-agenda-sorting-strategy '(deadline-up))
then run the view. It will not be sorted properly before the patch, but will be
after.
I would also recommend factoring the c
