Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-24 Thread Jambunathan K
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Good luck. Got my answer. The rest are just details.

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-23 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 01:06:35AM +0100, Marcin Borkowski wrote: Dnia 2014-03-22, o godz. 16:30:31 Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com napisał(a): Also, there is no backward-compatibility squad, only users who care about what they like. That is what they want us to believe! :)

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-23 Thread Marcin Borkowski
Dnia 2014-03-23, o godz. 12:32:46 Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com napisał(a): On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 01:06:35AM +0100, Marcin Borkowski wrote: Dnia 2014-03-22, o godz. 16:30:31 Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com napisał(a): Also, there is no backward-compatibility squad, only

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-22 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes: [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word** The attached files should speak for themselves. Such an arrangement a) Does not change the status quo AT ALL. b) Provide more rope. The patch is in the spirit of show

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-22 Thread Bastien
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: In a nutshell, I don't think this will go past the active backward-compatibility squad on the ML. What we're really after is a way to - keep single character markup ; - get rid of `org-emphasis-regexp-components' ; - allow

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-22 Thread Andreas Leha
Hi all, Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: [ ...] Also, there is no backward-compatibility squad, only users who care about what they like. I have been part in threads that discuss backward-compatibility. As it looks, there is the feeling that this ML is too(?) much concerned about

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-22 Thread Bastien
Hi Andreas, I'm also in favor of breaking backward compatibility when it benefits Org's users and developers. We should not consider changes only in terms of backward compatibility, we should also consider them by themselves. What I like with *this markup* is that it's non-intrusive: it's easy

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-22 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: What I'm after is a bit different: Is it? - keep single character markup; - simplify `org-emphasis-regexp-components' (getting it of it is the extreme version of simplifying it); You call it extreme, I label it ambitious. Also, getting rid of it really

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-22 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: You call it extreme, I label it ambitious. Also, getting rid of it really means no need to change it anymore. I'd rather have a static complex regexp than a simple customizable one for the sake of syntax consistency. Of course, a fixed simple

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-22 Thread Marcin Borkowski
Dnia 2014-03-22, o godz. 16:30:31 Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com napisał(a): Also, there is no backward-compatibility squad, only users who care about what they like. That is what they want us to believe! :) Ninja'd! Re: topic: one idea that is maybe not very Org-ish, but seems

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-22 Thread Samuel Wales
one option might be to keep what we have for emphasis, ossify it, and create a backend-independent nestable, multiline [and so on] markup for emphasis. but not just any syntax [because that would clutter us with more syntax]. this time it would be $[extensible :pretty-nicely t], and it will work

[O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-04 Thread Jambunathan K
Nicolas [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word** The attached files should speak for themselves. Such an arrangement a) Does not change the status quo AT ALL. b) Provide more rope. The patch is in the spirit of show and tell. I will not provide a formal patch. That

[O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-04 Thread Jambunathan K
Nicolas (Re-sent with the diff file) [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word** The attached files should speak for themselves. Such an arrangement a) Does not change the status quo AT ALL. b) Provide more rope. The patch is in the spirit of show and tell. That said,

[O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-04 Thread Jambunathan K
Nicolas (Sorry for multiple posts. `customize-save-variable' in the attached minimal emacs -- which I foolishly added to the top of my .emacs -- wiped out all my customizations including IMAP and SMTP settings) [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word** The attached

Re: [O] [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word**

2014-03-04 Thread Jambunathan K
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes: (with-eval-after-load 'org (setcar org-emphasis-regexp-components ^\\n) (setcar (cdr org-emphasis-regexp-components) ^\\n) (customize-save-variable 'org-emphasis-alist org-emphasis-alist)) A small correction Instead of \\n it should