Hi Thorsten
First thank you very much for creating outshine.
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
> I'm not sure how orgstruct-mode does it, but since outshine is a minor
> mode, it cannot use Key bindings exactly like Org, since many of these
> are used in
Michael Brand writes:
Hello Micheal,
> My requirements for orgstruct-mode or its replacement are very limited
> compared to what orgstruct-mode or outshine.el do or intend to do:
> 4) Key bindings exactly like Org
> All items 3)..7) are supported in orgstruct-mode,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Michael Brand
wrote:
> 6) No syntax highlighting of headings
To get the above behavior of orgstruct-mode in outshine for
programming modes I added outshine-fontify. It makes me ready to let
orgstruct-mode go.
outshine-fontify is a
Michael Brand writes:
> I assume in the above sentence you meant that a comment to be a
> heading has not to be indented.
Well, yes and no. On my config, " ;;; test" is highlighted as a
heading, but it's only foldable as ";;; test".
> That is at least what I
i wrote this a long time ago to summarize the different options for
editing notes in org.
warning: it might make zero sense to you.
maybe it will be useful to somebody.
===
sometimes you want the notes to stay in your external file
(example: whatever.el). but edit them in org mode.
orgstruct
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I am glad you are not planning to remove orgtbl-mode. In particular, in
> connection with radio tables, it is a feature that I use constantly, so I
> would object strongly to removing it.
Of course. "orgtbl-mode" is nice and certainly shouldn't
Hi Adam
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Adam Porter wrote:
> ;; Regular comment
> ;;; Heading level 1
> Heading level 2
> ...
>
> Then any comment that starts with 3 or more semicolons is indented to
> the left edge and becomes a collapsible heading, regardless of the
Hi Rasmus
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Rasmus wrote:
> FWIW, I use similar patterns,
>
> ;; outline-regexp: ";;\\*+\\|\\`"
> ;; orgstruct-heading-prefix-regexp: ";;\\*+\\|\\`"
Thank you, I will try that out.
Michael
Hi Adam
Thank you for all the explanations that I will study and try later.
Especially the origami package looks very useful to me.
Michael
Michael Brand writes:
> orgstruct-mode supports it with orgstruct-heading-prefix-regexp set to
> for example " *;;;* ".
FWIW, I use similar patterns,
;; outline-regexp: ";;\\*+\\|\\`"
;; orgstruct-heading-prefix-regexp: ";;\\*+\\|\\`"
Rasmus
--
This is
Michael Brand writes:
Hi Michael,
> First thank you for taking over maintenance of outshine.el from
> Thorsten Jolitz.
Well, I figured it was the least I could do, since he's put so much
effort into outshine, outorg, and navi-mode over the years. Be advised,
Hi Adam
First thank you for taking over maintenance of outshine.el from Thorsten Jolitz.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Adam Porter wrote:
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> I also would like to see a minor-mode for Org-like cycling when using
>> outline-minor-mode, as
Rasmus writes:
> I also would like to see a minor-mode for Org-like cycling when using
> outline-minor-mode, as I use this feature in init.el.
Outshine provides this feature. In my init file, I have headers like:
Org
And when I press TAB with point on that line, it
Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for bringing this up.
> I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base. Here is
> the rationale:
Ugh, I use it in init.el and for emails, but it doesn’t work great in
message-mode anyway. I miss list handling. Supposedly, you can get Emacs
to handle lists,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base. Here is
> the rationale:
>
> 1. It is broken. It might look like using Org in another buffer, but it
>is not. In particular, it just cannot cope with lists,
Thanks for pointing out speed keys in outshine.el that I was not aware
of. However I still failed.
My requirements for orgstruct-mode or its replacement are very limited
compared to what orgstruct-mode or outshine.el do or intend to do:
1) Only headings, no lists
2) No structure editing, only
Hi Nicolas,
I have not problems with removing orgstruct-mode, it is indeed a bad hack
and I am no longer using it.
I am glad you are not planning to remove orgtbl-mode. In particular, in
connection with radio tables, it is a feature that I use constantly, so I
would object strongly to removing
Hi Nicolas,
2017ko abuztuak 20an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base.
FWIW, +1 from me. I often bumped up against org-struct related
difficulties when coding on org, and I can easily imagine that removing
it will make
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:00 AM Michael Brand
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> If I understand correctly orgstruct-mode has much more convenient key
> bindings like TAB and its variants for cycling than outshine.el or
> outline-minor-mode which is a big advantage for me. When
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 9:58 AM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base.
Like many others who replied here, I also do not use Org Struct. So its
removal will have no effect on my workflow.
> 5. There are
On Tuesday, 22 Aug 2017 at 08:58, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
> Out of curiosity: did anyone consider using lentic
> (https://github.com/phillord/lentic) for that?
I did look at this in the past but it seemed overkill for emails... and
I use babel when programming otherwise so don't really
Hi all,
I'm in a similar situation - I only use Org-struct for my init.el, I'm
fine with dropping it.
On 2017-08-21, at 07:47, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> I have no issues with org-struct-mode being removed. I used to use
>> it,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base.
Like others, I only use Org Struct mode to get some Org-like list
handling and such when I'm writing email, and as Nicolas observes, it
barely works. So I'm OK with this,
Hello.
I have no issues with org-struct-mode being removed. I used to
use it, especially for emails. I now simply change the mode to
org, write whatever content I want, and then switch back to
message mode to send my email. [...]
I do exactly as Eric says here.
Actually, I didn't knew about
Hi all
If I understand correctly orgstruct-mode has much more convenient key
bindings like TAB and its variants for cycling than outshine.el or
outline-minor-mode which is a big advantage for me. When point is on a
heading also the other key bindings are just the same as in Org mode.
This was my
Eric S Fraga writes:
> I have no issues with org-struct-mode being removed. I used to use
> it, especially for emails. I now simply change the mode to org, write
> whatever content I want, and then switch back to message mode to send
> my email. Works fine and gives me the
I agree too, because the OrgStruct mode functions is so limited for basic
Org-mode viewing/editing/navigating etc.
[stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild
Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8E5
One of the reasons I moved to using mu4e for email was because I was
told I could use orgStruct mode and write my email using org structured
editing.
The reality has been somewhat disappointing. One of the main things I
wanted was better handling of lists and this is one area of orgstruct
mode
I have no issues with org-struct-mode being removed. I used to use it,
especially for emails. I now simply change the mode to org, write
whatever content I want, and then switch back to message mode to send my
email. Works fine and gives me the full power of org.
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs
On 08/20/2017 09:57 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base. Here is
> the rationale:
>
I use OrgStruct in my configuration files, but it is so limited that I've been
slowly moving my configuration to Org files. It is frustrating that
I have been using org-mode for a few years now, but have never yet
noticed org-struct mode. So removing org-struct would be no loss for me
(and possibly a gain, if it eased ongoing org-mode maintenance and
development).
OTOH I certainly do use and appreciate orgtbl minor mode, and it would
Hello,
I would like to remove Org Struct minor mode from Org code base. Here is
the rationale:
1. It is broken. It might look like using Org in another buffer, but it
is not. In particular, it just cannot cope with lists, indentation,
filling in, e.g., Message mode, as soon as we try
32 matches
Mail list logo