On 24.8.2011, at 20:29, Bastien wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
Let's consider the following table:
#+begin_src org
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
#+TBLFM: @2$1..@2$3=@1
#+end_src
If I remove the second column (M-S-Left), the formula is correctly
Carsten Dominik domi...@uva.nl writes:
Is this something that we can (easily) fix?
Not easily. I have made it throw an error now, but there may be
other situations like this which are not yet captured.
Throwing an error in this case is already an improvement -- thanks
for this!
--
Hi Carsten,
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
Let's consider the following table:
#+begin_src org
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
#+TBLFM: @2$1..@2$3=@1
#+end_src
If I remove the second column (M-S-Left), the formula is correctly
updated. But when I remove the last column, the
Hello,
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
Columns and rows are better referenced with and in many cases
to avoid such oddities:
#+begin_src org
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
#+TBLFM: @2$..@2$=@1
#+end_src
Thanks for the pointers.
Though, the object of my message was more
Hello,
Let's consider the following table:
#+begin_src org
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
#+TBLFM: @2$1..@2$3=@1
#+end_src
If I remove the second column (M-S-Left), the formula is correctly
updated. But when I remove the last column, the formula gets partly
deleted and becomes:
Hi Nicolas
Columns and rows are better referenced with and in many cases
to avoid such oddities:
#+begin_src org
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
#+TBLFM: @2$..@2$=@1
#+end_src
http://orgmode.org/manual/References.html#References
Michael
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 14:50, Nicolas Goaziou
