Re: [O] [new exporter] two unexpected behaviours of an #+INCLUDEd #+call

2012-10-28 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, "Myles English" writes: > Given the situation below, I would expect that the block named xxx > would never be evaluated: > > #- file b.org --- > #+TITLE: b.org > #+EXPORT_SELECT_TAGS: export > #+EXPORT_EXCLUDE_TAGS: noexport > > * A heading

Re: [O] [new exporter] two unexpected behaviours of an #+INCLUDEd #+call

2012-10-22 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, "Myles English" writes: > Just adding some evidence: similar behaviour was reported in this > thread: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-09/msg00634.html Yes, I'm working on it on my spare time but it requires some modifications to Babel core, so I'm advancing slowl

Re: [O] [new exporter] two unexpected behaviours of an #+INCLUDEd #+call

2012-10-22 Thread Myles English
Myles English writes: > Hi, > > I think there is a bug here. Just adding some evidence: similar behaviour was reported in this thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-09/msg00634.html Myles > > > Given the situation below, I would expect that the block named xxx > would n

[O] [new exporter] two unexpected behaviours of an #+INCLUDEd #+call

2012-10-18 Thread Myles English
Hi, I think there is a bug here. Given the situation below, I would expect that the block named xxx would never be evaluated: #- file b.org --- #+TITLE: b.org #+EXPORT_SELECT_TAGS: export #+EXPORT_EXCLUDE_TAGS: noexport * A heading:noexpo