Carsten Dominik writes:
[...]
> Thanks for the patch! Indeed, there was a bug here which always forced
> one particular date style even though the code was supposed to do the
> right thing. Thanks!
>
> However, instead of applying your patch, I thought that maybe I
> should put my foot where m
On Jun 16, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> On Jun 13, 2011, at 6:15 PM, Philipp Haselwarter wrote:
>>>
thanks, got it working now (with some fiddling).
looks like `calendar-date-style' is not honored /at all/,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> On Jun 13, 2011, at 6:15 PM, Philipp Haselwarter wrote:
>>
>>> thanks, got it working now (with some fiddling).
>>>
>>> looks like `calendar-date-style' is not honored /at all/, if you don't
>>> use -MM-DD format (as stated in the org-bbdb
