Rick Frankel writes:
> Ok, i see what's happening in your examples (a testing org file
> attached), though i question the usefullness of most of the results ;).
I tend to agree, but as the test case shows anything that does work and
produces the intended results will eventually have at least one u
On 2013-11-06 15:14, Achim Gratz wrote:
Achim Gratz writes:
[...]
with these formulas:
#+TBLFM: $=vsum(@-II..@-I)
whoops, press C-c C-c in the wrong buffer.
I meant these formulas:
#+TBLFM: @$=vsum(@-II..@-I)
#+TBLFM: @II=vsum(@-II..@-I)
#+TBLFM: @III=vsum(@-II..@-I)
#+TBLFM: @=vsum(@-II..
On 2013-11-07 00:59, Michael Brand wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Rick Frankel wrote:
+ (not (string-match "\.\.@" (car x
This would be the same as
+ (not (string-match "..@" (car x
but you meant
+ (not (string-match "\\.\\.@
Hi Rick
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Rick Frankel wrote:
> + (not (string-match "\.\.@" (car x
This would be the same as
> + (not (string-match "..@" (car x
but you meant
> + (not (string-match "\\.\\.@" (car x
Michael
Achim Gratz writes:
[...]
> with these formulas:
> #+TBLFM: $=vsum(@-II..@-I)
whoops, press C-c C-c in the wrong buffer.
I meant these formulas:
#+TBLFM: @$=vsum(@-II..@-I)
#+TBLFM: @II=vsum(@-II..@-I)
#+TBLFM: @III=vsum(@-II..@-I)
#+TBLFM: @=vsum(@-II..@-I)
#+TBLFM: @II..$2=vsum(@-II..@-I)
Rick Frankel writes:
> What he is saying, is that references like =@II$2=, or =@II+1$2= do not
> work correctly on the left-hand side of a table format (verified by
> carsten in a previous thread) which is why i created the patch to
> disallow hline-relative references on th LHS.
They are working,
On 2013-11-06 03:23, Bastien wrote:
lom...@voila.fr writes:
I was interested to use hline references on the left side. However I
found out that it
is not completely unsupported.
When the left side consist of:
* single cells references, it does not work
* ranged cells, it works for me (org 8.0.
Hi,
lom...@voila.fr writes:
> I was interested to use hline references on the left side. However I found
> out that it
> is not completely unsupported.
> When the left side consist of:
> * single cells references, it does not work
> * ranged cells, it works for me (org 8.0.3)
(I'm not sure I fu
Hi,
I was interested to use hline references on the left side. However I found out
that it
is not completely unsupported.
When the left side consist of:
* single cells references, it does not work
* ranged cells, it works for me (org 8.0.3)
The patch below tranforms the single cell references to
Hi Rick,
hline-relative references on the left side of a table are currently not
supported. The fact that this is expanded is a bug. A patch catching this
case would be very welcome.
Regards
- Carsten
On May 1, 2013, at 7:27 PM, Rick Frankel wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I don't know if this is a bug
Hi-
I don't know if this is a bug or feature :), but if an hline reference
(@I, etc) is used on the left side of a calculation, it applies to ALL
columns in the row even if the column is specfied.
Here are some examples to show the results. I would expect all three
versions to generate the same
11 matches
Mail list logo
