Re: [O] BUG?: BABEL - Release 8.2
Just to reiterate - is this only me or others as well? I consider this as a serious problem, as it can result in loss of data. If it is only me, I have to dig deeper into my config. Cheers, Rainer Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de writes: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi everyone, I have just released version 8.2 of Org mode. This is rather a minor release, mainly designed to do some stabilization and cleanup before the merge into Emacs. Bastien will do this next week (?). Just upgraded, to 8.2 and I found a bug: When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected and the code block is highlighted and an indirect buffer is opened. When I click into the highlighted block, I an send to the indirect buffer. This behavior changes, after saving with C-s, even when nothing has been edited: the area in the original org file looses its magic, and looks normal again and can also be edited! he indirect buffer stays functional and, upon close vie C-c ' saves the changes into the original buffer and overwrites changes done in this block. Can somebody please confirm? Rainer #secure method=pgpmime mode=sign -- Rainer M. Krug email: RMKrugatgmaildotcom
Re: [O] BUG?: BABEL - Release 8.2
I observe the same behavior with org installed from elpa/org-plus-contrib-20130916. Best, Ista On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de wrote: Just to reiterate - is this only me or others as well? I consider this as a serious problem, as it can result in loss of data. If it is only me, I have to dig deeper into my config. Cheers, Rainer Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de writes: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi everyone, I have just released version 8.2 of Org mode. This is rather a minor release, mainly designed to do some stabilization and cleanup before the merge into Emacs. Bastien will do this next week (?). Just upgraded, to 8.2 and I found a bug: When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected and the code block is highlighted and an indirect buffer is opened. When I click into the highlighted block, I an send to the indirect buffer. This behavior changes, after saving with C-s, even when nothing has been edited: the area in the original org file looses its magic, and looks normal again and can also be edited! he indirect buffer stays functional and, upon close vie C-c ' saves the changes into the original buffer and overwrites changes done in this block. Can somebody please confirm? Rainer #secure method=pgpmime mode=sign -- Rainer M. Krug email: RMKrugatgmaildotcom
[O] BUG?: BABEL - Release 8.2
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi everyone, I have just released version 8.2 of Org mode. This is rather a minor release, mainly designed to do some stabilization and cleanup before the merge into Emacs. Bastien will do this next week (?). Just upgraded, to 8.2 and I found a bug: When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected and the code block is highlighted and an indirect buffer is opened. When I click into the highlighted block, I an send to the indirect buffer. This behavior changes, after saving with C-s, even when nothing has been edited: the area in the original org file looses its magic, and looks normal again and can also be edited! he indirect buffer stays functional and, upon close vie C-c ' saves the changes into the original buffer and overwrites changes done in this block. Can somebody please confirm? Rainer -- Rainer M. Krug email: RMKrugatgmaildotcom
[O] BUG?: BABEL - Release 8.2
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi everyone, I have just released version 8.2 of Org mode. This is rather a minor release, mainly designed to do some stabilization and cleanup before the merge into Emacs. Bastien will do this next week (?). Just upgraded, to 8.2 and I found a bug: When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected and the code block is highlighted and an indirect buffer is opened. When I click into the highlighted block, I an send to the indirect buffer. This behavior changes, after saving with C-s, even when nothing has been edited: the area in the original org file looses its magic, and looks normal again and can also be edited! he indirect buffer stays functional and, upon close vie C-c ' saves the changes into the original buffer and overwrites changes done in this block. Can somebody please confirm? Rainer -- Rainer M. Krug email: RMKrugatgmaildotcom