Thanks!
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi Konstantin,
Konstantin Kliakhandler ko...@slumpy.org writes:
It appears that org-mode produces invalid latex code. An example
follows.
Fixed, thanks,
--
Bastien
Hello,
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Konstantin Kliakhandler ko...@slumpy.org writes:
It appears that org-mode produces invalid latex code. An example
follows.
Fixed, thanks,
I don't think this is the right fix. IIRC, I replaced \ul with
\uline a while ago for some reason (maybe a problem
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
I don't think this is the right fix. IIRC, I replaced \ul with
\uline a while ago for some reason (maybe a problem with newline
or unicode, I cannot remember). This would go backwards.
There are probably other solutions (e.g., remove
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Yes, maybe there is a better fix.
If you can find why you used \uline instead of \ul that will help
spot possible problems with the current fix, of course.
I'm not for getting rid of the problem before we can tell for sure
why the current solution is wrong.
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Yes, maybe there is a better fix.
If you can find why you used \uline instead of \ul that will help
spot possible problems with the current fix, of course.
I'm not for getting rid of the problem before we can tell
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
It is technically possible to use \underline (hard-coded) in sections
and \uline (or whatever is defined in`org-latex-text-markup-alist')
everywhere else.
Is there any downside to this proposal?
I don't know but it looks good to me,
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
I don't know but it looks good to me, because the shortcomings of
\underline not being able to wrap are not a problem for sections.
Here is the patch. b399ff0cba2382bf52d5bb6ef2b4a776fe0ac902 needs to be
reverted first.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
From
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
Here is the patch. b399ff0cba2382bf52d5bb6ef2b4a776fe0ac902 needs to be
reverted first.
Please go ahead, thanks,
--
Bastien
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
Here is the patch. b399ff0cba2382bf52d5bb6ef2b4a776fe0ac902 needs to be
reverted first.
Please go ahead, thanks,
Done.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
It is technically possible to use \underline (hard-coded) in sections
and \uline (or whatever is defined in`org-latex-text-markup-alist')
everywhere else.
Is there any downside to this proposal?
Disclaimer : While I do use LaTeX, I rarely use the
Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr writes:
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
It is technically possible to use \underline (hard-coded) in sections
and \uline (or whatever is defined in`org-latex-text-markup-alist')
everywhere else.
Is there any downside to this
Hello,
It appears that org-mode produces invalid latex code. An example
follows.
Best,
Kosta
Insert the following example text into an org buffer:
===
* _Example Text_
===
Then export as latex. The following is produced:
===
% Created 2014-03-21 Fri 17:45
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
Hi Konstantin,
Konstantin Kliakhandler ko...@slumpy.org writes:
It appears that org-mode produces invalid latex code. An example
follows.
Fixed, thanks,
--
Bastien
13 matches
Mail list logo
