On 5/5/11 May 5 -6:03 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Robert Goldman wrote:
>
>> AFAICT there is an off-by-one-error here. I.e., if I tell it that the
>> :minlevel is 2, then my included level one headers get level 3, and if I
>> tell it that the :minlevel is 1, then they get level 2.
>>
>
> I think th
Robert Goldman wrote:
> AFAICT there is an off-by-one-error here. I.e., if I tell it that the
> :minlevel is 2, then my included level one headers get level 3, and if I
> tell it that the :minlevel is 1, then they get level 2.
>
I think that's the desired behavior. That allows text before the
AFAICT there is an off-by-one-error here. I.e., if I tell it that the
:minlevel is 2, then my included level one headers get level 3, and if I
tell it that the :minlevel is 1, then they get level 2.
So it seems like :minlevel is actually being interpreted as a level
*increment*, rather than a min
