Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Bastien writes:
Aside from the issue of whether using macros here is needed or
appropriate, I can't find anything wrong with the macros or their use so
far. If that upholds, the test not working points to a rather
substantial bug in either
Bastien writes:
Aside from the issue of whether using macros here is needed or
appropriate, I can't find anything wrong with the macros or their use so
far. If that upholds, the test not working points to a rather
substantial bug in either the test framework or Emacs 24.3.
It's not too
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Aside from the issue of whether using macros here is needed or
appropriate, I can't find anything wrong with the macros or their use so
far. If that upholds, the test not working points to a rather
substantial bug in either the test framework
Bastien bzg at altern.org writes:
One potential problem in the first test is the use of parent as the
name of the symbol to pass to the macro... since this is the very same
name than the macro second argument. At least this reminded me this
section of Elisp manual:
I've actually tested this
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Bastien bzg at altern.org writes:
One potential problem in the first test is the use of parent as the
name of the symbol to pass to the macro... since this is the very same
name than the macro second argument. At least this reminded me this
Hi Achim,
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
Yes -- but what I'm arguing about is that the special syntax is not
needed. Or more specifically, it is not needed to have
(org-export-define-backend html
((bold . org-html-bold)
instead of just
(org-export-define-backend 'html
Bastien writes:
If we agree the macros are not really needed we can make the change.
We will always be free to find why the macros are causing problems
later one. I know the move looks like I want to avoid the problems
instead of fixing them, but it's not: it's about fixing the approach
I just installed Emacs 24.3.1 on OSX 10.8.2
and tried to build the latest git version of orgmode. It fails.
Is this due to the fact that I have a new emacs,
or is it a more general problem.
Here is the output from building:
Ran 428 tests, 426 results as expected, 2 unexpected (2013-03-13
Hi Erich,
Neuwirth Erich erich.neuwi...@univie.ac.at writes:
I just installed Emacs 24.3.1 on OSX 10.8.2
and tried to build the latest git version of orgmode. It fails.
Is this due to the fact that I have a new emacs,
or is it a more general problem.
It was a problem with Org. I just
I just installed Emacs 24.3.1 on OSX 10.8.2
and tried to build the latest git version of orgmode. It fails.
Is this due to the fact that I have a new emacs,
or is it a more general problem.
Here is the output from building:
Ran 428 tests, 426 results as expected, 2 unexpected (2013-03-13
Am 13.03.2013 12:58, schrieb Bastien:
Hi Erich,
Neuwirth Erich erich.neuwi...@univie.ac.at writes:
I just installed Emacs 24.3.1 on OSX 10.8.2
and tried to build the latest git version of orgmode. It fails.
Is this due to the fact that I have a new emacs,
or is it a more general problem.
It
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Röhler andreas.roeh...@easy-emacs.de writes:
should not the build process be independent from tests?
Yes, the default build process should be independant from
the tests, and it is. ~$ make up2 runs the test, but it
is not the default build process.
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
It was a problem with Org. I just removed the tests, which
pass fine when called interactively, but don't pass when run
in batch mode.
Since they did pass just until Emacs 24.3 was released (and still pass
with earlier versions) that should maybe give you some pause before you
13 matches
Mail list logo
