2014-06-08 15:07 GMT+02:00 Eric Schulte :
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
> > Cecil Westerhof writes:
> >
> >> At the moment I am using the following formula:
> >> #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2=vsum(@<<$2..@>>$2) ::
> >> @>$3=vsum(@<<$3..@>>$3) :: @>$4=vsum(@<<$4..@>>$4)
> >>
> >> This does
2014-06-08 13:53 GMT+02:00 Nick Dokos :
> Cecil Westerhof writes:
>
> > At the moment I am using the following formula:
> > #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2=vsum(@<<$2..@>>$2) ::
> @>$3=vsum(@<<$3..@>>$3) :: @>$4=vsum(@<<$4..@>>$4)
> >
> > This does what I want, but there are two thing
Nick Dokos writes:
> Cecil Westerhof writes:
>
>> At the moment I am using the following formula:
>> #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2=vsum(@<<$2..@>>$2) ::
>> @>$3=vsum(@<<$3..@>>$3) :: @>$4=vsum(@<<$4..@>>$4)
>>
>> This does what I want, but there are two things that could be improve
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> At the moment I am using the following formula:
> #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2=vsum(@<<$2..@>>$2) ::
> @>$3=vsum(@<<$3..@>>$3) :: @>$4=vsum(@<<$4..@>>$4)
>
> This does what I want, but there are two things that could be improved.
>
> - The second, third a
At the moment I am using the following formula:
#+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2=vsum(@<<$2..@>>$2) ::
@>$3=vsum(@<<$3..@>>$3) :: @>$4=vsum(@<<$4..@>>$4)
This does what I want, but there are two things that could be improved.
- The second, third and fourth formula do exactly the same,
