Re: [O] Different face for org-table fields with formulas

2011-12-11 Thread Bastien
Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com writes:

 I haven't tried it out, but I think that would be very nice as a
 standard feature in org.

You can now customize `org-table-formula-field-format'.

Thanks to Dov for this idea!

Best,

-- 
 Bastien



Re: [O] Different face for org-table fields with formulas

2011-12-06 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 05/12/11 22:29, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
 I had a look at the org-mode sources and found that this was quite 
 trivial to implement on the source level. E.g. the following patch 
 embeds the output of an org formula in ~~ to make it org-verbatim.
 This is easily changed to another couple of characters that may
 then be set in org-emphasis-alist to whatever formatting I fancy.
 
 index edcdbe1..9ad01d4 100644 --- a/lisp/org-table.el +++
 b/lisp/org-table.el @@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ $1-%s\n orig
 formula form0 form)) (message ))) (if (listp ev) (setq fmt nil ev
 #ERROR)) (org-table-justify-field-maybe - (if fmt (format fmt
 (string-to-number ev)) ev)) + (format ~%s~ (if fmt (format
 fmt (string-to-number ev)) ev))) (if (and down ( ndown 0)
 (looking-at .*\n[ \t]*|[^-])) (call-interactively 'org-return) 
 (setq ndown 0)))
 
 

I haven't tried it out, but I think that would be very nice as a
standard feature in org.

Cheers,

Rainer

 
 On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 09:15, Dov Grobgeld dov.grobg...@gmail.com 
 mailto:dov.grobg...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Has anyone hacked up the use of using a different face for
 org-table fields with formulas. This would be useful for quickly
 realizing what are inputs and outputs in a org spreadsheet.
 Currently I do this by adding the formatting ;~%.4f~ to my
 formulas. But it would be nicer if this was a settable property.
 
 Thanks! Dov
 
 


- -- 
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Stellenbosch University
South Africa

Tel :   +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
Cell:   +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
Fax :   +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44

Fax (D):+49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44

email:  rai...@krugs.de

Skype:  RMkrug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk7dzR4ACgkQoYgNqgF2egoueACgiG4Cqjc97RyFZ+TzVsqBYkWU
mZUAn3Npki29EerHBQ54y7qEzi2K7pEC
=3eFu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [O] Different face for org-table fields with formulas

2011-12-05 Thread Dov Grobgeld
I had a look at the org-mode sources and found that this was quite trivial
to implement on the source level. E.g. the following patch embeds the
output of an org formula in ~~ to make it org-verbatim. This is easily
changed to another couple of characters that may then be set in
org-emphasis-alist to whatever formatting I fancy.

index edcdbe1..9ad01d4 100644
--- a/lisp/org-table.el
+++ b/lisp/org-table.el
@@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ $1-%s\n orig formula form0 form))
 (message )))
 (if (listp ev) (setq fmt nil ev #ERROR))
 (org-table-justify-field-maybe
- (if fmt (format fmt (string-to-number ev)) ev))
+ (format ~%s~ (if fmt (format fmt (string-to-number ev)) ev)))
 (if (and down ( ndown 0) (looking-at .*\n[ \t]*|[^-]))
 (call-interactively 'org-return)
   (setq ndown 0)))



On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 09:15, Dov Grobgeld dov.grobg...@gmail.com wrote:

 Has anyone hacked up the use of using a different face for org-table
 fields with formulas. This would be useful for quickly realizing what are
 inputs and outputs in a org spreadsheet. Currently I do this by adding the
 formatting ;~%.4f~ to my formulas. But it would be nicer if this was a
 settable property.

 Thanks!
 Dov




[O] Different face for org-table fields with formulas

2011-12-03 Thread Dov Grobgeld
Has anyone hacked up the use of using a different face for org-table fields
with formulas. This would be useful for quickly realizing what are inputs
and outputs in a org spreadsheet. Currently I do this by adding the
formatting ;~%.4f~ to my formulas. But it would be nicer if this was a
settable property.

Thanks!
Dov