Stefan Huchler writes:
> What I have more a problem with is that it often hangs have to cancel
> it at least every seond time.
Sounds like something that might need to be reported as a bug?
Alexis.
Rainer M Krug writes:
> Stefan Huchler writes:
>
>> I dont really get what the problem is here, email servers checkup is
>
> Not necessarily - depends which mail server (e.g. gmail or local), if
> you have one or many folders / tags, your network connection, ...
I just did setup the nnrss-downl
Alexis writes:
> If i may ask, which email front-end were you using? (Gnus, perhaps?) i
> used to use notmuch.el, and currently use mu4e, and basically don't have
> this issue
My GNUS + IMAP subprocess + Maildir used to lead to long wait times when
updating for new mail ("g" in Groups). Th
Stefan Huchler writes:
> I dont really get what the problem is here, email servers checkup is
Not necessarily - depends which mail server (e.g. gmail or local), if
you have one or many folders / tags, your network connection, ...
Often used solution:
mail server (e.g. gmail) <- offlineimap ->
I dont really get what the problem is here, email servers checkup is
fast enough, and rss u can use that:
nnrss-use-local to ‘t’ and use ‘nnrss-generate-download-script
On Wednesday, 17 Sep 2014 at 11:41, Fabrice Popineau wrote:
[...]
> I disagree on this. The problem is less servers than the sheer slowness of
> elisp.
Sure, elisp is not fast but I it seems to be perfectly fast enough for
me for gnus, even on my little OpenPandora. In my case, the limiting
fac
2014-09-17 11:06 GMT+02:00 Eric S Fraga :
> On Wednesday, 17 Sep 2014 at 18:54, Alexis wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > If i may ask, which email front-end were you using? (Gnus, perhaps?) i
> > used to use notmuch.el, and currently use mu4e, and basically don't have
> > this issue
>
> The issue is not
On Wednesday, 17 Sep 2014 at 18:54, Alexis wrote:
[...]
> If i may ask, which email front-end were you using? (Gnus, perhaps?) i
> used to use notmuch.el, and currently use mu4e, and basically don't have
> this issue
The issue is not the email front-end per se but the email servers (IMAP,
P
Eric S Fraga writes:
> The issue is not the email front-end per se but the email servers (IMAP,
> POP, whatever). A couple of years ago, I ended up having to use an
> email server that would take many seconds, often minutes, to access,
> even just to query to find out if there was any new email.
Fabrice Popineau writes:
> Yes seconds or even much more.
> This is the reason I don't use Emacs to read my mail/news anymore :-/
If i may ask, which email front-end were you using? (Gnus, perhaps?) i
used to use notmuch.el, and currently use mu4e, and basically don't have
this issue
Alex
2014-09-17 9:56 GMT+02:00 Paul Rudin :
> Fabrice Popineau writes:
>
> > What is the purpose of opening a second instance of emacs ?
> > I precisely tend to avoid it.
>
> There are situations where it can be useful - e.g. using emacs as
> a news or mail client where the whole process can block for
Hi Paul,
yes, adding (require 'server) makes the function available. That is exactly
what I was looking for. Thanks for the quick response!
Cheers,
Gonzalo
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Paul Rudin wrote:
> Gonzalo Camarillo writes:
>
>
> > Does anybody know a workaround so that the serve
Fabrice Popineau writes:
> What is the purpose of opening a second instance of emacs ?
> I precisely tend to avoid it.
>
> If the emacs server is running, why not using emacsclient(w) instead
> of a new instance ?
I had that setup for quite some time - starting one Emacs server on the
console,
Fabrice Popineau writes:
> What is the purpose of opening a second instance of emacs ?
> I precisely tend to avoid it.
There are situations where it can be useful - e.g. using emacs as
a news or mail client where the whole process can block for a few
seconds.
What is the purpose of opening a second instance of emacs ?
I precisely tend to avoid it.
If the emacs server is running, why not using emacsclient(w) instead of a
new instance ?
Fabrice
2014-09-17 9:26 GMT+02:00 Gonzalo Camarillo :
> Hi,
>
> I am using org-protocol to have my firefox browser t
Gonzalo Camarillo writes:
> Does anybody know a workaround so that the server is only started
> once?...
Does the function server-running-p work on windows? If so then you can
replace (server-start) with (unless (server-running-p) (server-start)).
Hi,
I am using org-protocol to have my firefox browser talk to my emacs (to
capture stuff).
I am using Windows 7. So, I cannot use the --daemon flag to simply start
a sever (it is not supported under Windows). Instead, I have added a
(server-start) line to my .emacs file (init.el).
When I run em
17 matches
Mail list logo
