Alan Schmitt writes:
> OK, I put it on the previous line. I'll commit now.
Thank you.
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Alan Schmitt writes:
>
> +(mapcar #'org-babel-trim (reverse raw)))
> + (raw (org-babel-trim clean))
> + (result-params (cdr (assoc :result-params params)))
> + (parsed
> + (string-match
> +"\\(\\(.*\n\\)
Alan Schmitt writes:
+ (mapcar #'org-babel-trim (reverse raw)))
+(raw (org-babel-trim clean))
+(result-params (cdr (assoc :result-params params)))
+(parsed
+ (string-match
+ "\\(\\(.*\n\\)*\\)[^:\n]+ : \\([^=\n]+\\) =
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Alan Schmitt writes:
>
>> Should I push this patch?
>
> Nitpick: it is better to remove the dangling parenthesis prior to
> this. Thanks.
I'm sorry, but I don't see a dangling parenthesis. Where is it?
Thanks,
Alan
Hello,
Alan Schmitt writes:
> Should I push this patch?
Nitpick: it is better to remove the dangling parenthesis prior to this. Thanks.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hi Alan,
Alan Schmitt writes:
> Should I push this patch?
Please go ahead,
--
Bastien
Hello,
Alan Schmitt writes:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a patch that allows for the output of ocaml babel blocks to be
> captured. It also makes the parsing of the resulting value more robust:
> results of type "string list" are now converted to a table, for
> instance.
>
> At the moment I only check f
Hello,
Here is a patch that allows for the output of ocaml babel blocks to be
captured. It also makes the parsing of the resulting value more robust:
results of type "string list" are now converted to a table, for
instance.
At the moment I only check for results of the form "verbatim" or
"output"
Eric Schulte writes:
> You can step through the execution of `org-babel-execute:ocaml' by first
> evaluating the function with a prefix argument (meaning with the cursor
> within the function body press C-u C-A-x) which will edebug [1] the
> function.
>
> You can then evaluate an OCaml code block
Alan Schmitt writes:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that ob-ocaml does not support ":results output". For instance,
> evaluating the following block:
>
> #+begin_src ocaml :results output
> Printf.printf "foo\nbar\n";;
> #+end_src
>
> Does not result in the two lines "foo" and "bar" but in the value being
Hello,
It seems that ob-ocaml does not support ":results output". For instance,
evaluating the following block:
#+begin_src ocaml :results output
Printf.printf "foo\nbar\n";;
#+end_src
Does not result in the two lines "foo" and "bar" but in the value being
returned.
Unfortunately I don't know e
11 matches
Mail list logo
