Hi Matt,
Matt Lundin writes:
> FWIW, I find the [O] label a little bit too short and cryptic for
> effective visual scanning. It is very similar, for instance to [OT], a
> commonly used subject label. I first thought it might stand for "Open",
> until I found all the other posts bearing the labe
Matt Lundin writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Artificially adding the [Orgmode] label to make sure nobody misses this
>> announcement.
>>
> FWIW, this new label seems to have confused Gmane:
>
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode
I should clarify. The old [Orgmode] label was automatically r
Bastien writes:
> Artificially adding the [Orgmode] label to make sure nobody misses this
> announcement.
>
FWIW, this new label seems to have confused Gmane:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode
Best,
Matt
--
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Dear all,
I've replaced the tag [Orgmode] with [O] for this mailing list.
If you are filtering the list by matching [Orgmode] in the subject
line, please update your MUA filters.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply A
Hi Bastien,
should this announcement not using the old tag? Just to avoid that the mail
get lost due to still old filter rules?
Just an idea from good old amateur radio days. You have to announce the
change of frequency on the old frequency ;)
Torsten
On Feb 28, 2011 7:57 PM, "Bastien" wrote:
> De
Dear all,
I've replaced the tag [Orgmode] with [O] for this mailing list.
If you are filtering the list by matching [Orgmode] in the subject
line, please update your MUA filters.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply A
