Hello,
Aaron Ecay writes:
> LGTM. I’ve probably met my quota of org-related fun for the day (see
> below...), but implementing this in terms of elements will be my next
> org-list related task.
What is "this"?
Unfortunately org-list and Elements do not play nicely with each other
at the momen
Thanks for fixing this.
Hi Nicolas,
2015ko azaroak 8an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
[...]
> Anyway, this we're really nitpicking. There's nothing fundamentally
> wrong in either choice.
You’re right, and I’m not trying to be quarrelsome. At least for me,
it’s helpful to understand the perspective on things like t
Aaron Ecay writes:
> I don’t think we should unit-test only public API functions.
I didn't say that. However, I wouldn't write tests for "--" functions.
> Indeed, I find it easier to write unit tests for small functions,
> since I don’t have to construct a lot of extra context to exercise all
>
Hi Nicolas,
2015ko azaroak 7an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Aaron Ecay writes:
>
>> On a broader scope, this is just one part of org that is written in this
>> style (one large let that defines many functions which call each other;
>> the body of the let is just a call into one of these
Aaron Ecay writes:
> On a broader scope, this is just one part of org that is written in this
> style (one large let that defines many functions which call each other;
> the body of the let is just a call into one of these functions). This
> isn’t idiomatic elisp (at least, I’ve never seen it ou
Hi Nicolas,
2015ko azaroak 7an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Hello,
>
> Aaron Ecay writes:
>
>> The org-list code is a mess, and I think we should hold off on converting
>> it to lexical scoping until it can be refactored in a more dedicated
>> way.
>
> It seems a bit strong considerin
Hello,
Aaron Ecay writes:
> The org-list code is a mess, and I think we should hold off on converting
> it to lexical scoping until it can be refactored in a more dedicated
> way.
It seems a bit strong considering there's only one issue so far. I don't
think the code is a mess, but "Send and re
Thanks for working on this Aaron but M-x ediff-patch-file failed for me.
I am on the cce317 commit of org-mode
(http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=265e5b9984818f76dea8f5147af0c4a939cf457b)
patching file /home/kmodi/e/elisp/org-mode/lisp_25_0/org-list.el
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2923
Hi Kaushal,
I can reproduce the bug, and you’re right about the cause. I made the
attached patch, which seems to get the code back on its feet. But I
just sort of fiddled with it until all the lexical scoping warnings from
the compiler went away; I have no idea whether it’s correct.
The org-lis
Lesser steps to recreate this bug:
(1) In any buffer, do M-x org-mode
(2) Type: - item 1
(3) Do M-RET
Now you have
- item 1
-
(4) Now do C-c *
Boom!
Hi,
Here the required info:
Org-mode version 8.3.2 (release_8.3.2-287-gcce317 @
/home/kmodi/usr_local/apps/6/emacs/master/share/emacs/site-lisp/org/)
The bug is very easy to recreate.
(1) In any buffer, M-x org-mode
(2) Type * heading 1
(3) Do M-RET
Now you have
* heading 1
*
(4) Do C-c -
No
12 matches
Mail list logo
