On 2015-05-18 23:42, Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
On 2015-04-24, at 08:19, Vikas Rawal vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org wrote:
I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of text
(not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to be dealt
with.
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Then it cannot even replace inlinetasks.
Is that a goal?
It should be.
We don't need another syntax for something that does almost the same
thing as an inlinetask but, yet, isn't one. Inline todo/inlinetasks,
Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
But note that I am more interested in an inline noting/todo functionality
as opposed to annotation functionality.
Inline noting is
Text[@:1][@]
* Annotations
[@:1:] My note.
My guess would be that most notes are short. For
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Fine whit me. For that I I have inlinetasks.
Then it cannot even replace inlinetasks.
The tags. They are notes related to say a sentence, so you put a note at
the end of a sentence. Spatial TODOs.
I still don't get it, sorry.
Its virtues are compactness,
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Fine whit me. For that I I have inlinetasks.
Then it cannot even replace inlinetasks.
Is that a goal?
Its virtues are compactness, being similar to a list, being C-k friendly,
and, IMO, more intuitive.
But, IMO, totally useless for general
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 15:16, Rasmus wrote:
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
I don't know what is a TODO functionality since you suggest to not make
it appear in the agenda.
E.g. Sentence about BAR [TODO: add reference to FOO and check
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
My guess would be that most notes are short. For such notes, but not
necessarily for longer notes, [@:NOTE] would be more convenient.
This is very limited: you cannot write two paragraphs in your note.
Though I don't know what the @ signifies.
AnnoTate?
I
On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 15:16, Rasmus wrote:
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
[...]
I don't know what is a TODO functionality since you suggest to not make
it appear in the agenda.
E.g. Sentence about BAR [TODO: add reference to FOO and check BAZ]. I
don't need that in my
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
My guess would be that most notes are short. For such notes, but not
necessarily for longer notes, [@:NOTE] would be more convenient.
This is very limited: you cannot write two paragraphs in your note.
Fine whit me. For that I I have
Hi all,
Actually, having pondered this whole annotation and task business while
heading home after work on the train, I think all I would like is a
simple annotation scheme with no need for tasks etc. We have plenty of
support for tasks with headlines. What we don't have is simple
annotations.
On 2015-04-24, at 08:19, Vikas Rawal vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org wrote:
I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of text
(not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to be dealt
with.
What could be an the easy way of doing it?
Well, it
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 15:16, Rasmus wrote:
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
I don't know what is a TODO functionality since you suggest to not make
it appear in the agenda.
E.g. Sentence about BAR [TODO:
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Hello,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
We're just talking about annotations-plus-metadata here, right? Not
actual in-text TODOs?
I'm not convinced in-text TODOs would be interesting, because they would
make building the
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
While we have opening and closing tags for formatting (e.g. bold), I
dislike the above. It seems like asking for trouble; it would seem one
could easily loose track and delete one end of the tag and not the other.
IOW: [@:ID1]... [@:ID2]...[@]...[@] seems like
Hello,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
We're just talking about annotations-plus-metadata here, right? Not
actual in-text TODOs?
I'm not convinced in-text TODOs would be interesting, because they would
make building the agenda an order of magnitude slower.
My concerns about
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Hi,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
We're just talking about annotations-plus-metadata here, right? Not
actual in-text TODOs?
I don't know.
From what I can tell, rasmus seems to be proposing an in-text TODO,
I mainly extrapolated from your
Hi,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
We're just talking about annotations-plus-metadata here, right? Not
actual in-text TODOs?
I don't know.
From what I can tell, rasmus seems to be proposing an in-text TODO,
I mainly extrapolated from your example. Further, I extrapolated
On Thursday, 30 Apr 2015 at 11:58, Rasmus wrote:
[...]
I've definitely wanted some sort of a track changes equivalent in Org,
but we'd want to be careful about this.
Isn't this the job of VC? I'm not sure how we can concisely represent all
the needed metadata? Something like
I'm 100%
Rasmus writes:
Hi,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
We're just talking about annotations-plus-metadata here, right? Not
actual in-text TODOs?
I don't know.
From what I can tell, rasmus seems to be proposing an in-text TODO,
I mainly extrapolated from your example.
Hello,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
I'm copying Nicolas -- Nicolas, is there a process for inclusion in
contrib? Would this be eligible? I'll just stick it in Elpa,
otherwise.
Any package is eligible.
However, contrib/ is from pre-package.el days. Nowadays, I tend to
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Hi Eric,
I added some functions in the attachment. they colorize the comments,
add an org-comment menu to the org-menu, and some functions for pop to
and delete comments from
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
*None* of the complexity is in the format itself: if you unloaded
org-comment, the comment links would be perfectly human-readable. All of
the complexity is in helper functions for manipulating them. I suppose
it would be possible to
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Would this be eligible?
Not that my .02€ are worth much, but I think the idea of inline notes is
good, but I don't think it should be done using links. See e.g. the
discussion on citation which introduced a
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Hello,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
I'm copying Nicolas -- Nicolas, is there a process for inclusion in
contrib? Would this be eligible? I'll just stick it in Elpa,
otherwise.
Any package is eligible.
However, contrib/
Hi,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Just to be clear, you think it fits into the category of
incubation-prior-to-core?
I think inlinetasks/comments that are actually *inline* would be nice!
If anyone thinks that this mechanism warrants actual new Org syntax, I'd
be happy to
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Would this be eligible?
Not that my .02€ are worth much, but I think the idea of inline notes is
good, but I don't think it should be done using links. See e.g. the
discussion on citation which introduced a [cite:⋯] command. A [comment:⋯]
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Yup, annotation mechanism is about right. Just to be clear, you think
it fits into the category of incubation-prior-to-core?
I think so.
If anyone thinks that this mechanism warrants actual new Org syntax, I'd
be happy to work on implementing
Hello all,
I have been following this whole thread with great interest, having
posted very early on the use of inline tasks as a solution for the OP.
I use inline tasks a lot for both annotations and for TODO tasks when
writing papers. I like the link syntax proposed but would much prefer
I think it could benefit from a dedicated syntax in the following
context:
There are different types of annotation you might like, e.g. delete,
insert, replace, comment (I am drawing from ideas of annotations in PDF,
and the idea of track changes). In multi-author documents you might want
to know
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Would this be eligible?
Not that my .02€ are worth much, but I think the idea of inline notes is
good, but I don't think it should be done using links. See e.g. the
discussion on
Eric S Fraga writes:
Hello all,
I have been following this whole thread with great interest, having
posted very early on the use of inline tasks as a solution for the OP.
I use inline tasks a lot for both annotations and for TODO tasks when
writing papers. I like the link syntax proposed
On Wednesday, 29 Apr 2015 at 20:34, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
[...]
Yup, annotation mechanism is about right. Just to be clear, you think
it fits into the category of incubation-prior-to-core?
[...]
Now I wish we'd named it org-annotate.
Is it too late? Simple refactoring of the code?
I
Rasmus writes:
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
*None* of the complexity is in the format itself: if you unloaded
org-comment, the comment links would be perfectly human-readable. All of
the complexity is in helper functions for manipulating them. I suppose
it
On Wednesday, 29 Apr 2015 at 10:00, John Kitchin wrote:
[...]
There is in org-comment a command `org-comment-display-comments' which
will generate a buffer you can see all the comments in, and from that
pop to a comment, delete it, etc...
Ah, thanks. That's good.
--
: Eric S Fraga
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Yup, annotation mechanism is about right. Just to be clear, you think
it fits into the category of incubation-prior-to-core?
I think so.
If anyone thinks that this mechanism warrants actual new
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Hi,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Just to be clear, you think it fits into the category of
incubation-prior-to-core?
I think inlinetasks/comments that are actually *inline* would be nice!
If anyone thinks that this mechanism warrants actual
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
On Wednesday, 29 Apr 2015 at 20:34, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
[...]
Yup, annotation mechanism is about right. Just to be clear, you think
it fits into the category of incubation-prior-to-core?
[...]
Now I wish we'd named it org-annotate.
Is it too
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Hi Eric,
I added some functions in the attachment. they colorize the comments,
add an org-comment menu to the org-menu, and some functions for pop to
and delete comments from the list mode, and a hydra for commands to
insert comments. Do you want
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Hi Eric,
I added some functions in the attachment. they colorize the comments,
add an org-comment menu to the org-menu, and some functions for pop to
and delete comments from the list mode, and a hydra for commands to
This might be a case where having a link type that supports attributes
would come in handy. Then you could use these like PDF comments. In the
list of PDF comments in Adobe Acrobat for example, there is a checkbox you
can use to check them off when you are done with one. Of course, you have
to
On 2015-04-27, at 12:27, John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
This might be a case where having a link type that supports attributes
would come in handy. Then you could use these like PDF comments. In the
list of PDF comments in Adobe Acrobat for example, there is a checkbox you
can
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Very nice start!
- make comment links a different color/face
(e.g. https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/blob/master/org-ref.el#L360)
Ah, nice -- too bad there's no built-in way to specify a face for link
types. This looks like it will do nicely,
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
On 2015-04-27, at 12:27, John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
This might be a case where having a link type that supports attributes
would come in handy. Then you could use these like PDF comments. In the
list of PDF comments in Adobe Acrobat
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Emacs anticipated this need and can help formulate comments
specifically for the NSA :)
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Mail-Amusements.html
Well that's pretty amazing.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Eric Abrahamsen
Emacs anticipated this need and can help formulate comments specifically
for the NSA :)
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Mail-Amusements.html
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie
Hi Eric,
I added some functions in the attachment. they colorize the comments,
add an org-comment menu to the org-menu, and some functions for pop to
and delete comments from the list mode, and a hydra for commands to
insert comments. Do you want to get this up on github to facilitate
developing
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Hi Eric,
I added some functions in the attachment. they colorize the comments,
add an org-comment menu to the org-menu, and some functions for pop to
and delete comments from the list mode, and a hydra for commands to
insert comments. Do you want
Very nice start!
- make comment links a different color/face
(e.g. https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/blob/master/org-ref.el#L360)
otherwise, I think item 4 is the most important one on the todo list. We
are writing lots of papers this year, so this will be a really helpful tool!
Eric
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Vikas Rawal vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org writes:
On 25-Apr-2015, at 6:22 am, John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu
wrote:
Inspired by this conversation, I hacked up this functional comment
link:
John,
thanks for this. Very nice. And I can use my preferred LaTeX
annotation with it easily.
--
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.1, Org release_8.3beta-1062-gce4e64
Vikas Rawal vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org writes:
On 25-Apr-2015, at 6:22 am, John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu
wrote:
Inspired by this conversation, I hacked up this functional comment
link:
Vikas Rawal vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org writes:
I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of
text (not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to
be dealt with.
What could be an the easy way of doing it?
Vikas
Bookmarks?
hth,
Tom
--
Thomas
On Friday, 24 Apr 2015 at 09:58, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
Why use footnotes when you can use todonotes?
Good question!
It's personal preference: I prefer footnotes as I am often using narrow
margins and anything more than a boxed footnote number is too
much... However, it is trivial to
On 2015-04-24, at 09:40, Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
On Friday, 24 Apr 2015 at 11:49, Vikas Rawal wrote:
I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of
text (not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to
be dealt with.
What could be an
Inspired by this conversation, I hacked up this functional comment link:
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2015/04/24/Commenting-in-org-files/
It has a custom link type that exports in html and latex, and when you
click on it, it asks if you want to delete the comment.
John
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Inspired by this conversation, I hacked up this functional comment
link:
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2015/04/24/Commenting-in-org-files/
It has a custom link type that exports in html and latex, and when you
click on it, it asks if
On 25-Apr-2015, at 6:22 am, John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
Inspired by this conversation, I hacked up this functional comment link:
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2015/04/24/Commenting-in-org-files/
Vikas Rawal vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org writes:
I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of text
(not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to be dealt
with.
What could be an the easy way of doing it?
I use footnotes for this sort of
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Vikas Rawal vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org writes:
I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of text
(not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to be dealt
with.
What could be an the easy way of
Vikas Rawal vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org writes:
I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of
text (not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to
be dealt with.
What could be an the easy way of doing it?
Just insert something like '' [1]at
Vikas Rawal wrote:
I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of
text (not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to
be dealt with.
What could be an the easy way of doing it?
Inserting `XXX' which are automatically highlighted in red?
See Highlight
On Friday, 24 Apr 2015 at 11:49, Vikas Rawal wrote:
I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of
text (not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to
be dealt with.
What could be an the easy way of doing it?
I use inline tasks for this. If you are
On 2015-04-24, at 08:42, Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com wrote:
Vikas Rawal vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org writes:
I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of
text (not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to
be dealt with.
What could be an the
[...]
Why use footnotes when you can use todonotes?
Good question!
It's personal preference: I prefer footnotes as I am often using narrow
margins and anything more than a boxed footnote number is too
much... However, it is trivial to change the export template to use
todonotes if
64 matches
Mail list logo
