Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-08 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, "Berry, Charles" writes: > @cindex @code{:sep}, src header argument > > The @code{:sep} header argument is the delimiter for saving results as tables > to files (@pxref{file}) external to Org mode. Org defaults to tab delimited > output. The function, @code{org-open-at-point}, which is

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-08 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Bastien writes: > See line 17450 in doc/org-manual.org of the current master. This is not a section, actually not in the Texinfo sense. See line 17452 in the same document. I.e., there is no node attached to it, it cannot be accessed from "m" menu from `info', and it doesn't appear in the node m

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-08 Thread Bastien
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> There is a section called "Header arguments" in the new >> org-manual.org. > > No, there is not. See line 17450 in doc/org-manual.org of the current master. -- Bastien

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-08 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Bastien writes: > Why did you remove colon prefixes? As I explained, many structural objects start with a colon. Some of them were indexed with a colon, others were not. This is confusing. The best solution was to remove colons from entries in index. Adding colons everywhere would crippl

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-08 Thread Bastien
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Kaushal Modi writes: > >> In the Org 9.1 version manual, it was possible to search ":eval" and find >> what I was looking for. In 9.2 manual, very few of the header arguments are >> documented with the colon prefix. > > I removed all colon prefixes, so it i

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-02 Thread Berry, Charles
> On May 2, 2018, at 3:56 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > "Berry, Charles" writes: > >> cmdline (not in the previous info version either) >> sep > > I'm not sure what these two are about (the :sep is not documented > either). Re :sep, FWIW I found this in org.texi from late 2017:

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-02 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Kaushal Modi writes: > In the Org 9.1 version manual, it was possible to search ":eval" and find > what I was looking for. In 9.2 manual, very few of the header arguments are > documented with the colon prefix. I removed all colon prefixes, so it is a bug if any header argument is prefix

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-02 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, "Berry, Charles" writes: > cmdline (not in the previous info version either) > sep I'm not sure what these two are about (the :sep is not documented either). Besides, :cmdline doesn't seem to be used consistently everywhere. It could probably be moved out of "ob-core.el" and re-introduc

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-01 Thread Berry, Charles
> On May 1, 2018, at 2:49 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > "Berry, Charles" writes: > >> I miss not being able to refer to a single section in the manual so >> I can browse the useful babel header arguments whose name, spelling, >> or function I have forgotten. I guess it was re-org

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-01 Thread Berry, Charles
> On May 1, 2018, at 3:10 PM, Kaushal Modi wrote: > > Hi Nicolas, > > I ran into this issue too very recently when I wanted to search for ":eval". > Details below. > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:50 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Yes, and it took me a long while to properly put all these argum

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-01 Thread Kaushal Modi
Hi Nicolas, I ran into this issue too very recently when I wanted to search for ":eval". Details below. On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:50 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Yes, and it took me a long while to properly put all these arguments in > a logical place instead of having them piled on top of each

Re: [O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-01 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, "Berry, Charles" writes: > I miss not being able to refer to a single section in the manual so > I can browse the useful babel header arguments whose name, spelling, > or function I have forgotten. I guess it was re-organized out of the > manual in the update to the new org formatted manu

[O] Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual

2018-05-01 Thread Berry, Charles
I miss not being able to refer to a single section in the manual so I can browse the useful babel header arguments whose name, spelling, or function I have forgotten. I guess it was re-organized out of the manual in the update to the new org formatted manual. Is there any way to recover this?