Re: [O] More specific LaTeX output classes

2011-12-02 Thread Nick Dokos
Niels Giesen wrote: > Ken Williams writes: > > > [...] > > > Would it be possible for the export process to define various classes > > that default to being exactly like 'verbatim', but could be > > customized? After that, a next step might be to provide nice defaults > > that do things like

Re: [O] More specific LaTeX output classes

2011-12-02 Thread Niels Giesen
Ken Williams writes: [...] > Would it be possible for the export process to define various classes > that default to being exactly like 'verbatim', but could be > customized? After that, a next step might be to provide nice defaults > that do things like syntax-highlighting (through the 'minted

[O] More specific LaTeX output classes

2011-12-02 Thread Ken Williams
If I export the following code to LaTeX: -- #+begin_src R CV.t.hat <- rowMeans(loss)[m] CV.t.hat #+end_src #+results: : [1] 1.135857 -- , then it looks like this in the *.tex file: -- \begin{verbatim} CV.t.hat <- rowMeans(l