[removed Grégoire Jadi from the discussion.]
On Thu, Nov 10 2016, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Joost Kremers writes:
Like I said, I'd be happy to take over maintainance. Just let
me know
how to go about making it available to org-contrib. (If there
Hello,
Joost Kremers writes:
> Like I said, I'd be happy to take over maintainance. Just let me know
> how to go about making it available to org-contrib. (If there is a way
> to keep the file in the main Ebib repository, that would be my
> preference.)
We don't need
On 11/10/16 10:50, Joost Kremers wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 08 2016, Joost Kremers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 08 2016, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>> So you mean there is no equivalent to both
>>>
>>> (ebib-cur-entry-key)
>>
>> This one was what I was worried about, but on second thought, it
>>
On 11/08/16 13:23, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Joost Kremers writes:
>
>> I just ran into org-ebib.el, a file that's part of org-contrib.
>> I noticed that it uses functions from Ebib that were renamed pretty
>> much exactly two years ago. (They're internal
On Tue, Nov 08 2016, Joost Kremers wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 08 2016, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
So you mean there is no equivalent to both
(ebib-cur-entry-key)
This one was what I was worried about, but on second thought, it
should be possible to simply use:
(ebib--get-key-at-point)
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 08 2016, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
So you mean there is no equivalent to both
(ebib-cur-entry-key)
This one was what I was worried about, but on second thought, it
should be possible to simply use:
(ebib--get-key-at-point)
and
(ebib-db-get-field-value 'title key
Hello,
Joost Kremers writes:
> I just ran into org-ebib.el, a file that's part of org-contrib.
> I noticed that it uses functions from Ebib that were renamed pretty
> much exactly two years ago. (They're internal functions and thus got
> an extra dash.) This could in
Hi all,
I just ran into org-ebib.el, a file that's part of org-contrib. I
noticed that it uses functions from Ebib that were renamed pretty
much exactly two years ago. (They're internal functions and thus
got an extra dash.) This could in principle be fixed by changing
the relevant function