Bastien writes:
> Maybe we could write an interactive exporter generator based on ox.el?
>
> Something with simple questions that will write the new ox-xxx.el file
> itself, with no fiddling from the user. Not immediately, at least.
That'd be cool too, but why not do it via late binding so that
Wes Hardaker writes:
>> What feature from `org-export-generic' do you think is missing in
>> ox.el?
>
> ox.el is a wonderfully designed parser and exporter (from what I've read
> of code, not actually used it (yet)). And my kudos to that and the
> suite of exporters that go with it!
>
> org-expo
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> "ox.el" is a generic exporter. I think we should focus on developing
> export back-ends for this one instead.
>
> What feature from `org-export-generic' do you think is missing in
> ox.el?
ox.el is a wonderfully designed parser and exporter (from what I've read
of code,
Hello,
Wes Hardaker writes:
> celano writes:
>
>> I tried exporting a text with emphasize, but it doesn't work.
>> The man page speaks about sections, lists and such other things, but
>> nothing about emphasizing and bold text.
>> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-export-generic.html
>
>
celano writes:
> I tried exporting a text with emphasize, but it doesn't work.
> The man page speaks about sections, lists and such other things, but
> nothing about emphasizing and bold text.
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-export-generic.html
You're right that it doesn't do this.
Th
