* Bastien wrote:
> Hi Karl,
Hi!
> Karl Voit writes:
>
> The idea behind some helper commands to let people construct diary
> sexp is that:
>
> - it won't complexify Org's syntax about timestamps
> - such help commands can be maintained and improved independantly
> from Org
I see the benefi
Hi Karl,
Karl Voit writes:
> For example.
>
> Or an extended syntax of the existing timestamps as I suggested
> somewhere in this thread:
>
> <2011-07-01 Fri +1w> <-2011-07-08 Fri>
>
> ... or similar for an exception of a recurring event.
thanks for the suggestion, I saw it in your previous
* Bastien wrote:
> Hi Karl,
Hi!
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> Yes, there is this sexp-workaround[1] for more complex things but
>> quite frankly: this is not an option for the ordinary user like me
>> (not having that much ELISP knowledge).
>
> FWIW: what would perhaps be useful is an interactive wa
Hi Karl,
Karl Voit writes:
> Yes, there is this sexp-workaround[1] for more complex things but
> quite frankly: this is not an option for the ordinary user like me
> (not having that much ELISP knowledge).
FWIW: what would perhaps be useful is an interactive way to easily
produce such sexp diar
Hi Karl,
Karl Voit writes:
> Although this is mentioned in chapter 2 of the Org-mode manual, I
> strongly urge to mention this in section 8.3.2 «Repeated tasks»[1]
> too!
>
> Where can I place this wish?
for your next wish -- one that is not already accomplished :) -- please
create a new thread
* Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Karl Voit writes:
>
> Better yet, however, is to update the documentation yourself and submit
> a patch!
Pulled the current Org-mode files, read the contribution
instructions[1], found the spot where the information should go and
... boom:
,[ http://orgmode.org/org.h
* Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>
>> Sure, org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift is very cool indeed. But it
>> goes in this direction:
>>
>> * Event <2011-06-21 Tue>
>> * Event <2011-06-28 Tue>
>> * Event <2011-07-05 Tue>
>> * Event <2011-07-12 Tue +1w>
>>
>> But I aim in
Karl Voit writes:
> * Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Karl Voit writes:
>>
>
>>> * Eric S Fraga wrote:
you can clone with time shift whole trees, etc.
>>>
>>> Oh, I have to look up that clone thing. This is new to me. Do you
>>> happen to have an URL for this feature by instance?
>>
>> ,[ or
Karl Voit writes:
[...]
> Sure, org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift is very cool indeed. But it
> goes in this direction:
>
> * Event <2011-06-21 Tue>
> * Event <2011-06-28 Tue>
> * Event <2011-07-05 Tue>
> * Event <2011-07-12 Tue +1w>
>
> But I aim in a slightly different direct
* Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> * Eric S Fraga wrote:
>>> you can clone with time shift whole trees, etc.
>>
>> Oh, I have to look up that clone thing. This is new to me. Do you
>> happen to have an URL for this feature by instance?
>
> ,[ org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift ]
Karl Voit writes:
>> you can clone with time shift whole trees, etc.
>
> Oh, I have to look up that clone thing. This is new to me. Do you
> happen to have an URL for this feature by instance?
C-h i
d
m "org "
i "clone "
,[ (info "(org)Structure editing") ]
| `C-c C-x c' (`org-clone-s
Karl Voit writes:
> * Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Karl Voit writes:
>>
>
>>> IMHO: Org-mode does *not* seem to be made for managing calendar
>>> events that go beyond simple one-time-occurrence events.
>>
>> I would argue that this is not at all the case, especially if you
>> consider that org uses
* Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> IMHO: Org-mode does *not* seem to be made for managing calendar
>> events that go beyond simple one-time-occurrence events.
>
> I would argue that this is not at all the case, especially if you
> consider that org uses a tree hierarchy and tags so t
Karl Voit writes:
> * Eric S Fraga wrote:
>>
>> In my case, it's more about calendar events than tasks. My tasks are
>> typically for my information only but meetings etc involve multiple
>> people.
>
> IMHO: Org-mode does *not* seem to be made for managing calendar
> events that go beyond simp
* Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> In my case, it's more about calendar events than tasks. My tasks are
> typically for my information only but meetings etc involve multiple
> people.
IMHO: Org-mode does *not* seem to be made for managing calendar
events that go beyond simple one-time-occurrence events.
15 matches
Mail list logo