Dov Grobgeld writes:
> Nice! I've needed that often. But please add licensing information
> to the code to make clear in what contexts it may be used.
You mean, for the Python bits I sent to the list? For such a short
amount of code, do whatever you feel like it. If you really want an
explic
Bastien writes:
> Would you like something like
> | 3.1 |
> | 3.1415 |
> be aligned/modified as
> | 3.1000 |
> | 3.1415 |
> ?
More precisely as:
> | 3.1|
> | 3.1415 |
which is aligning on dots, even if it looks like left-justifying.
There is a problem in that I have tables using a d
Nice! I've needed that often. But please add licensing information to
the code to make clear in what contexts it may be used.
Regards,
Dov
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Bastien wrote:
>
> Hi François,
>
> François Pinard writes:
>
> > I do not know, and should check indeed. Yet, even then,
Hi François,
François Pinard writes:
> I do not know, and should check indeed. Yet, even then, it does not
> mean Org tables could not do better than standard practice! :-)
Would you like something like
| 3.1 |
| 3.1415 |
be aligned/modified as
| 3.1000 |
| 3.1415 |
?
I personally would
Bastien writes:
> Hi François,
Salut, et Joyeuses Festivités! :-)
>> I recently needed to produce Org tables from within Python
> Thanks for the code, if some can test it and put it on worg, all the
> better (if you agree of course.)
Of course!
>> I wrongly thought Org mode was aligning floa
Hi François,
François Pinard writes:
> I recently needed to produce Org tables from within Python, splitting
> them as needed to fit within a preset width. I append the code after my
> signature, in case it would be useful to others (or even, if you have
> ideas to improve it).
Thanks for the
Hi, Org people.
I recently needed to produce Org tables from within Python, splitting
them as needed to fit within a preset width. I append the code after my
signature, in case it would be useful to others (or even, if you have
ideas to improve it).
One thing I only realized after writing this,
