Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Bastien]

Hi Rasmus,

Rasmus  writes:

> I am waiting for 9.1.12.

It's been out since a few hours, I will mention it on the list
explicitely.

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Rasmus]

Bastien  writes:

> Hi Nicolas and all,
>
> Bastien  writes:
>
>> I'm back from a few days off, I'll be able to make the 9.2 release
>> at the end of next week.  I've released 9.1.10 in the meantime.
>
> I'm now reading past emails and checking things for 9.2.
>
> Maybe we will need to release 9.1.12 before 9.2, as there are some
> new bugfixes in maint.

I am waiting for 9.1.12.

Please consider making the release soon, as an upstream merge would have
to be approved first.

Thanks,
Rasmus

-- 
I hear there's rumors on the, uh, Internets. . .

Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Bastien]

Hi Nicolas and all,

Bastien  writes:

> I'm back from a few days off, I'll be able to make the 9.2 release
> at the end of next week.  I've released 9.1.10 in the meantime.

I'm now reading past emails and checking things for 9.2.

Maybe we will need to release 9.1.12 before 9.2, as there are some
new bugfixes in maint.

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Bastien]

Hi Rasmus,

Rasmus  writes:

> What is the best way to make a CHANGELOG from 9.1.9 to 9.1.11?  Should I
> just copy the git log?

Yes, I guess so.

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Bastien]

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou  writes:

> I suggest to release Org 9.1.11 by the beginning of the next week, and
> merge in into Emacs. Hopefully, this will be the last update included in
> Emacs 26.

I've released 9.1.11 -- I won't have time to check Org before next
tuesday, so please let's wait until wednesday before merging 9.1.11
as the latest release to be included in Emacs 26.  If  you haven't
heard of me on wednesday, please go ahead with 9.1.11 in Emacs.

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Rasmus]

Nicolas Goaziou  writes:

> Hello,
>
> Bastien  writes:
>
>> yes, let's move forward.
>>
>> I'm back from a few days off, I'll be able to make the 9.2 release
>> at the end of next week.  I've released 9.1.10 in the meantime.
>
> Great.
>
> I suggest to release Org 9.1.11 by the beginning of the next week, and
> merge in into Emacs. Hopefully, this will be the last update included in
> Emacs 26.

Fine by me, but we’d need to clear the merge with upstream beforehand.

What is the best way to make a CHANGELOG from 9.1.9 to 9.1.11?  Should I
just copy the git log?

Rasmus

-- 
This message is brought to you by the department of redundant departments

Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Bastien  writes:

> yes, let's move forward.
>
> I'm back from a few days off, I'll be able to make the 9.2 release
> at the end of next week.  I've released 9.1.10 in the meantime.

Great.

I suggest to release Org 9.1.11 by the beginning of the next week, and
merge in into Emacs. Hopefully, this will be the last update included in
Emacs 26.

WDYT?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou0x80A93738

Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Bastien]

Hi Nicolas,

yes, let's move forward.

I'm back from a few days off, I'll be able to make the 9.2 release
at the end of next week.  I've released 9.1.10 in the meantime.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Samuel Wales  writes:

> :tags:in:the:agenda:
>
> look:like:this
>
> is this deliberate?

No, it isn't.

Fixed. Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[stardiviner]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256


Nicolas Goaziou  writes:

> I think current development branch is in good shape. I think there is no
> blocker, although there are a few reported bugs floating around.

I agree. In this period, no big features, only small patches. It's time
to a regularly new release.

- --
[ stardiviner ] don't need to convince with trends.
   Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/
   IRC(freenode): stardiviner
   GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8J9lDX1nSBmJJZFAG13xyVromsMFAlraioYACgkQG13xyVro
msMkHAf/YlGIcqvtJTl1ERq3EiapMWhu00zJdzi5dTQsYMoETtctxRtqpOekWJwj
S+Pl7w1uybP/FlmNw7Djj2b/T/kTFirnNpyuU+EeXeiBkN0UmOFc6O0tt+vzjoUM
yOndGDRpHR4wrOzVtLzSIm6P2oUec/QhAp8mqHbHOuoVjwSS2C1hTvuPTFdroplb
CaVeP4YQ5lvz2Ld49qWJ0vFFoOPo6sBCyxmJZYiS/ORzUoIeMhcVl3u/AtZmarPj
w10Zv+Y6nvvF6F3Br1giS3XvOgcXd5KLrcQXAJeDqvWEzY3otf2gyB2zPk5kk0+H
lZYj8913JYHYkIHGIbhmP5l7B1rR+w==
=W6Rd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Samuel Wales]

:tags:in:the:agenda:

look:like:this

is this deliberate?


On 4/20/18, Nicolas Goaziou  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think current development branch is in good shape. I think there is no
> blocker, although there are a few reported bugs floating around.
>
> Is there any pending feature that should absolutely go into Org 9.2?
>
> Bastien, what do you think?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou0x80A93738
>
>


-- 
The Kafka Pandemic: 

The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. And ANYBODY
can get it at any time.

"You’ve really gotta quit this and get moving, because this is murder
by neglect." ---
.

[O] Release Org 9.2 soon ?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

I think current development branch is in good shape. I think there is no
blocker, although there are a few reported bugs floating around.

Is there any pending feature that should absolutely go into Org 9.2?

Bastien, what do you think?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou0x80A93738