Hi Michael,
Michael Brand writes:
> So I think that the change as it is today has to be reverted.
Done. Let's digg this later on, thanks for your help on this.
--
Bastien
Hi Bastien
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Bastien wrote:
> I used (sit-for 3) after the message to increase the odds
> that the user gets it.
I tried and had to see that (sit-for) has the same problems like
(ding) or (error) when used in org-file-contents. I noticed even one
more problem in ad
Hi Michael,
Michael Brand writes:
> Is there any opinion or help on how to improve this?
I used (sit-for 3) after the message to increase the odds
that the user gets it.
--
Bastien
Hi all
I had to experience that a #+SETUPFILE: pointing to a nonexisting file
results in not more than two times a (message) "Cannot read file
[...]" in the messages buffer which I didn't notice in the first
place. Only when I noticed that my custom todo keywords configuration
was missing I starte
