Nick Dokos writes:
> Well, the proper thing is very much in the eye of the beholder :-)
My mother, who was a musician and a painter, used to say:
"Des goûts et des couleurs, on ne discute pas...
Mais il y en a de meilleurs que d'autres!"
The sentence is soft and spicy all at once! A bit
Nick Dokos writes:
> Well, the proper thing is very much in the eye of the beholder :-)
My mother, who was a musician and a painter, used to say:
"Des goûts et des couleurs, on ne discute pas...
Mais il y en a de meilleurs que d'autres!"
The sentence is soft and spicy all at once! A bit
François Pinard wrote:
> It usually does not do the proper thing alone, but `C-l C-l C-l' is
> closer to what I want.
>
Well, the proper thing is very much in the eye of the beholder :-)
Also, I never noticed the binding change: I've been living my life thinking
that C-l *is* recenter... Than
Nick Dokos writes:
> François Pinard wrote:
>> Very, very often, after a Shift-TAB that collapses all entries, [...]
>> I [...] scroll down so see it all.
> You'd need to code it somewhat carefully sp that you wouldn't lose the
> property that after a couple of S-TABs, the buffer looks the same
François Pinard wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> Very, very often, after a Shift-TAB that collapses all entries, a few
> lines in the vicinity of the cursor are shown at the top of the window,
> which is mainly empty for its reminder; we contemplate the vacuum
> *after* the file. As my Org files are such
Hi again.
Very, very often, after a Shift-TAB that collapses all entries, a few
lines in the vicinity of the cursor are shown at the top of the window,
which is mainly empty for its reminder; we contemplate the vacuum
*after* the file. As my Org files are such that all the top level lines
usually
