Hello all,
Andreas Leha wrote:
> t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
>> Eric Schulte writes:
>>> Bastien writes:
"Sebastien Vauban" writes:
> As there was no reaction to this, I'd like to bump it up. At least, to
> either
> have a discussion on this, or a clearly stated
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
> Eric Schulte writes:
>
>> Bastien writes:
>>
>>> Hi Sébastien,
>>>
>>> "Sebastien Vauban"
>>> writes:
>>>
As there was no reaction to this, I'd like to bump it up. At least, to
either
have a discussion on this, or a clearly stated "no go"
Eric Schulte writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Hi Sébastien,
>>
>> "Sebastien Vauban"
>> writes:
>>
>>> As there was no reaction to this, I'd like to bump it up. At least, to
>>> either
>>> have a discussion on this, or a clearly stated "no go".
>>
>> I tend to agree with Jay here and I prefer
Bastien writes:
> Hi Sébastien,
>
> "Sebastien Vauban"
> writes:
>
>> As there was no reaction to this, I'd like to bump it up. At least, to either
>> have a discussion on this, or a clearly stated "no go".
>
> I tend to agree with Jay here and I prefer the minimalist syntax,
> although values
Hi Sébastien,
"Sebastien Vauban"
writes:
> As there was no reaction to this, I'd like to bump it up. At least, to either
> have a discussion on this, or a clearly stated "no go".
I tend to agree with Jay here and I prefer the minimalist syntax,
although values for the :results parameter are h
Greetings,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:30 PM, shripad sinari
wrote:
[snip]
I am happy with the current behavior, but
that isn't to say it couldn't possibly be improved or that I
disagree with Sebastien's suggestions. It did take me quite some
time to figure out what the heck was going on with it
I think Sebastian's suggestions are very nice and would be very helpful.
Shripad
Tucson, AZ
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > As there was no reaction to this, I'd like to bump it up. At least, to
> either
> > have a discussio
Sebastien Vauban writes:
> Hello,
>
> As there was no reaction to this, I'd like to bump it up. At least, to either
> have a discussion on this, or a clearly stated "no go".
Okay, if nobody else answers, here I go! I am happy with the current
approach as it's easier for me to see, at a glance,
Hello,
As there was no reaction to this, I'd like to bump it up. At least, to either
have a discussion on this, or a clearly stated "no go".
Best regards,
Seb
"Sebastien Vauban" wrote:
> Before Org 8 is out, I'm willing to put light on some last syntax which I find
> counter-intuitive and not al
