Re: [O] Test failure

2018-02-15 Thread Nick Dokos
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > It looks like I created absolute symlinks instead of relative ones. > > Could you confirm it is now fixed? > It is fixed: Ran 790 tests, 790 results as expected (2018-02-15 11:45:03-0500) 9 expected failures Thanks! -- Nick

Re: [O] Test failure

2018-02-15 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Nick Dokos writes: > Org mode version 9.1.6 (release_9.1.6-474-g58da7d @ > /home/nick/elisp/org-mode/lisp/) > > I updated to the above and got two test failures: > > , > | 2 unexpected results: > |FAILED test-org-publish/base-extension > |FAILED test-org-publish/get-project

[O] Test failure

2018-02-14 Thread Nick Dokos
Org mode version 9.1.6 (release_9.1.6-474-g58da7d @ /home/nick/elisp/org-mode/lisp/) I updated to the above and got two test failures: , | 2 unexpected results: |FAILED test-org-publish/base-extension |FAILED test-org-publish/get-project-from-filename ` Details on the first on

Re: [O] Test failure with current head

2015-07-17 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Nick Dokos writes: > I just updated to release_8.3beta-1286-g20795fd. > > ``make test'' shows a failure on test 226: > >passed 225/592 test-org-babel/src-block-regexp > Updating dynamic block `clocktable' at line 2... > Updating dynamic block `clocktable' at line 2...done > Test tes

Re: [O] Test failure with current head

2015-07-16 Thread Nick Dokos
Rasmus writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> I ran ``make test'' in a loop, 3 iterations per minute, >> for about an hour - no (unexpected) failures. Whatever it is, >> it's hiding. > > But did you change the clock to before 13:00? Now it's 10:30 I get the > error. > > I get c76fef6b9df3ffbb6a1cf40

Re: [O] Test failure with current head

2015-07-16 Thread Rasmus
Nick Dokos writes: > I ran ``make test'' in a loop, 3 iterations per minute, > for about an hour - no (unexpected) failures. Whatever it is, > it's hiding. But did you change the clock to before 13:00? Now it's 10:30 I get the error. I get c76fef6b9df3ffbb6a1cf4047f391721c4076caa is the bad co

Re: [O] Test failure with current head

2015-07-15 Thread Nick Dokos
Rasmus writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Rasmus writes: >> >>> Nick Dokos writes: >>> I just updated to release_8.3beta-1286-g20795fd. ``make test'' shows a failure on test 226: FAILED 226/592 test-org-clock/clocktable-until-now The backtrace was edited

Re: [O] Test failure with current head

2015-07-15 Thread Rasmus
David Engster writes: > Nick Dokos writes: >> Rasmus writes: >> > >>> Nick Dokos writes: >>> I just updated to release_8.3beta-1286-g20795fd. ``make test'' shows a failure on test 226: FAILED 226/592 test-org-clock/clocktable-until-now The backtrace was e

Re: [O] Test failure with current head

2015-07-15 Thread Rasmus
Nick Dokos writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> Nick Dokos writes: >> >>> I just updated to release_8.3beta-1286-g20795fd. >>> >>> ``make test'' shows a failure on test 226: >>>FAILED 226/592 test-org-clock/clocktable-until-now >>> >>> >>> The backtrace was edited to get rid of a NUL that gnus c

Re: [O] Test failure with current head

2015-07-15 Thread David Engster
Nick Dokos writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> Nick Dokos writes: >> >>> I just updated to release_8.3beta-1286-g20795fd. >>> >>> ``make test'' shows a failure on test 226: >>>FAILED 226/592 test-org-clock/clocktable-until-now >>> >>> >>> The backtrace was edited to get rid of a NUL that gnus com

Re: [O] Test failure with current head

2015-07-15 Thread Nick Dokos
Rasmus writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> I just updated to release_8.3beta-1286-g20795fd. >> >> ``make test'' shows a failure on test 226: >>FAILED 226/592 test-org-clock/clocktable-until-now >> >> >> The backtrace was edited to get rid of a NUL that gnus complained > > I know. I don't re

Re: [O] Test failure with current head

2015-07-15 Thread Rasmus
Nick Dokos writes: > I just updated to release_8.3beta-1286-g20795fd. > > ``make test'' shows a failure on test 226: >FAILED 226/592 test-org-clock/clocktable-until-now > > > The backtrace was edited to get rid of a NUL that gnus complained I know. I don't really understand what untilnow

[O] Test failure with current head

2015-07-15 Thread Nick Dokos
I just updated to release_8.3beta-1286-g20795fd. ``make test'' shows a failure on test 226: --8<---cut here---start->8--- passed 225/592 test-org-babel/src-block-regexp Updating dynamic block `clocktable' at line 2... Updating dynamic block `clocktable' a

Re: [O] Test failure

2014-07-23 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> I just pulled (HEAD is 02f2d5b42aabe9e272a5967ad0483b38750a8392) >> and got this test failure: [...] > Nicolas removed the "$" at the end of the regexps identifying LaTeX > environments here: > > > http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/c

Re: [O] Test failure

2014-07-22 Thread Nick Dokos
Rasmus writes: > > Nicolas removed the "$" at the end of the regexps identifying LaTeX > environments here: > > > http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=ec0e3cf70ba353ea59a5e66235462f659c99 > > There a current thread discussion of this behavior on this list called > somethin

Re: [O] Test failure

2014-07-22 Thread Rasmus
Hi Nick, Nick Dokos writes: > I just pulled (HEAD is 02f2d5b42aabe9e272a5967ad0483b38750a8392) > and got this test failure: > > , > | Test test-org-element/latex-environment-parser backtrace: > | (if (not (unwind-protect (setq value-102202 (apply fn-102200 args-10 > | (let (form-descript

[O] Test failure

2014-07-22 Thread Nick Dokos
I just pulled (HEAD is 02f2d5b42aabe9e272a5967ad0483b38750a8392) and got this test failure: , | Test test-org-element/latex-environment-parser backtrace: | (if (not (unwind-protect (setq value-102202 (apply fn-102200 args-10 | (let (form-description-102204) (if (not (unwind-protect (setq

Re: [O] test failure

2012-12-15 Thread Bastien
Hi Nick, Nick Dokos writes: > ``make test'' fails on just-updated org: > > Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-725-ge55681 @ > /home/nick/elisp/org-mode/lisp/) > > with the following backtrace: > > , > | Test test-org-src/blank-line-block backtrace: Fixed, thanks. > I thought Michael Br

[O] test failure

2012-12-14 Thread Nick Dokos
``make test'' fails on just-updated org: Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-725-ge55681 @ /home/nick/elisp/org-mode/lisp/) with the following backtrace: , | Test test-org-src/blank-line-block backtrace: | signal(user-error ("No special environment to edit here")) | user-error("No spe

Re: [O] [test] Failure on GNU Emacs 22.3.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) of 2011-05-28 on x60s

2011-11-07 Thread Martyn Jago
David Maus writes: > Running the test suit on > > GNU Emacs 22.3.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) of 2011-05-28 on x60s > > currently fails with the backtrace below. > > Somehwere/somehow Babel ends up calling `member' with the second > argument not being a list. In Emacs22 this triggers an error, but not >

[O] [test] Failure on GNU Emacs 22.3.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) of 2011-05-28 on x60s

2011-11-06 Thread David Maus
Running the test suit on GNU Emacs 22.3.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) of 2011-05-28 on x60s currently fails with the backtrace below. Somehwere/somehow Babel ends up calling `member' with the second argument not being a list. In Emacs22 this triggers an error, but not so in Emacs23 and upwards. Devs do